The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 4, 2026
Quarterly Article
Andrew Fenelon
May 31, 2026
March 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Housing is a fundamental social determinant of health and is particularly amenable to policy intervention. However, the nationwide housing affordability crisis presents significant challenges for leveraging housing policy to improve population health in the United States. The US public housing program began during the New Deal, but has changed considerably since the mid-20th century. The program provides affordable and stable housing to nearly 1 million low-income families, and may offer lessons for a way forward in improving health through better and more stable housing.
Methods: Comparing the health impacts of US housing programs, public housing stands out as an unexpected success. Children in public housing experience better mental health, fewer emergency room visits, and greater housing stability. Adults report better physical and mental health, reduced risk of diabetes, and improved food security. However, recent federal housing policy has emphasized the tenant-centered housing voucher program at the expense of public housing.
Findings: While the contemporary public housing program improves health and well-being across the life course, the early public housing program may offer lessons to improve outcomes in the 21st century. Specifically, a renewed public housing could focus on high-quality construction, emphasize effective management, and serve a broader spectrum of income levels. I also outline how public housing could benefit from an increasing role for state policy and enable integration across levels of government.
Conclusions: Housing is particularly responsive to public housing, but current housing policies have proven insufficient to guarantee stable housing for all. The public housing program offers a promising way forward to leverage housing to address the US population health crisis.
