The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 1992 (Volume 70)
Quarterly Article
Marc A. Rodwin
Sep 25, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Recent issues of financial conflicts of interest for physicians are illuminated by the history of similar issues from 1890 to 1992 and the response of the organized medical profession to activities like payment of commissions, or “fee splitting,” physical ownership of medical facilities, and dispensing of drugs. The medical profession tried to confront these and related conflicts early in the century, in some cases by adopting ethical codes, but was unable to enforce standards of conduct. Since the 1950s, substitutes for fee splitting emerged and were tolerated by the profession. Moreover, its stance became weaker as it abandoned its earlier clear ethical prohibitions and relied instead on subjective standards and, more recently, on disclosure to patients. The medical profession still favors voluntary codes of ethics, setting aspirational goals, promoting a patient-centered ethos, and relying on the good will of individual doctors-tactics for dealing with financial conflicts of interest that this review of recent history suggests are inadequate. Instead, public intervention is required to address these problems.
Author(s): Marc A. Rodwin
Read on JSTOR
Volume 70, Issue 4 (pages 703–741) Published in 1992