The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
August 27, 2025
Quarterly Article
Amanda I. Mauri
Zoe Lindenfeld
Charley Willison
THERESE L. TODD
Jonathan Purtle
DIANA SILVER
Aug 27, 2025
June 2025
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Individuals with behavioral health disorders are more likely to experience substantial harm from a police encounter, prompting reforms to minimize encounters between police and people experiencing a behavioral health crisis. One strategy involves expanding partnerships between certified community behavioral health clinic (CCBHC) mobile crisis teams and emergency response systems, often through two models: 911 referral, wherein a CCBHC’s behavioral health practitioner–only team responds to 911 calls, and co-response, wherein a CCBHC clinician joins a police or emergency medical services (EMS) team. We examine whether the internal capacity of the CCBHC and external police capacity influence when CCBHCs engage in these partnerships.
Methods: Using data from the only national survey of CCBHCs, this study applies multivariable logistic regression to assess whether CCBHC staff capacity and police capacity are associated with CCBHC–emergency response system partnerships in mobile crisis, controlling for organizational characteristics of the CCBHC and demographic and socioeconomic features of its service area.
Findings: One-third (33.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.0-40.0) of CCBHCs report a 911 referral partnership, and nearly half (48.5%, 95% CI 41.1-55.9) report a co-response arrangement. While police capacity is not significantly associated with co-response, a one standard deviation increase in police capacity corresponds to an 11.0-percentage-point (95% CI −19.5 to −2.5) decrease in the predicted probability of a 911 referral partnership. CCBHC capacity is not associated with 911 referral arrangements, but CCBHCs in the top tertile of CCBHC capacity are 19.2 (95% CI 4.3-34.2) percentage points more likely to report a co-response partnership.
Conclusions: The internal capacity of CCBHCs and external police capacity are associated with when CCBHCs partner with emergency response systems in mobile crisis. Because a robust behavioral health crisis system likely requires multiple response models with varying police involvement, stakeholders may need different strategies depending on the type of partnership they aim to expand.