The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
February 18, 2026
Quarterly Article
Julianna Pacheco
Nicole Novak
Samantha Deragon
Stephanie Schmitt
December 2025
Mental Health and Substance Use Challenges
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: We broaden our understanding of community power by going beyond traditional measures of voting and voting rights. Our objectives are to (1) create county-level measures of community power that are more expansive than voting and (2) explore the descriptive and geographic patterns of community power.
Methods: Six novel measures of community power were developed at the county level. Three were indicators of power-building activities that overcome historic power imbalances faced by Latino populations. These include measures on political representation, immigrant incorporation, and language accessibility for elections. We also measured three indicators related to immigration enforcement that act to exacerbate historical power disparities. Correlational and spatial analyses were conducted to better understand descriptive and geographic patterns.
Findings: We found little evidence that our measures are correlated; spatial analyses largely confirmed this. There was evidence of regional spatial autocorrelation, but inferences depended largely on the measure used. We generally found that counties with more than 10% of residents who identify as Latino have higher values on our power-building measures, suggesting that these areas are especially primed to amplify the voices of Latino residents. Interestingly, our measures related to immigration enforcement were largely unrelated to recent Latino population growth (e.g., “new destination counties”).
Conclusions: Power is a fundamental driver of the conditions that produce or mitigate health disparities, but the process by which communities influence decision making may be difficult to measure. This work provides a blueprint for future scholars studying the link between community power and health equity across different races, ethnicities, and citizenship statuses.
