The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
December 2010 (Volume 88)
December 2010 | Heather C. Kaplan, Patrick W. Brady, Michele C. Dritz, David K. Hooper, W. Matthew Linam, Craig M. Froehle, Peter Margolis
Context: The mixed results of success among QI initiatives may be due to differences in the context of these initiatives.
Methods: The business and health care literature was systematically reviewed to identify contextual factors that might influence QI success; to categorize, summarize, and synthesize these factors; and to understand the current stage of development of this research field.
Findings: Forty-seven articles were included in the final review. Consistent with current theories of implementation and organization change, leadership from top management, organizational culture, data infrastructure and information systems, and years involved in QI were suggested as important to QI success. Other potentially important factors identified in this review included: physician involvement in QI, microsystem motivation to change, resources for QI, and QI team leadership. Key limitations in the existing literature were the lack of a practical conceptual model, the lack of clear definitions of contextual factors, and the lack of well-specified measures.
Conclusions: Several contextual factors were shown to be important to QI success, although the current body of literature lacks adequate definitions and is characterized by considerable variability in how contextual factors are measured across studies. Future research should focus on identifying and developing measures of context tied to a conceptual model that examines context across all levels of the health care system and explores the relationships among various aspects of context.
Author(s): Heather C. Kaplan; Patrick W. Brady; Michele C. Dritz; David K. Hooper; W. Matthew Linam; Craig M. Froehle; Peter Margolis
Keywords: total quality management; quality assurance; health care; quality improvement; context
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 88, Issue 4 (pages 500–559)
Published in 2010
Evidence on the Efficacy of Inpatient Spending on Medicare Patients
What Is This Knowledge That We Seek to “Exchange”?