The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 1994 (Volume 72)
Quarterly Article
Howard A. Fishbein
Sep 22, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
The creation of a social program like the Maryland Medicaid Diabetes Care Program (DCP) represents a major service delivery and policy effort that deserves our attention. In the context of health care reform, evaluating such a program represents a serious challenge. Program evaluations for large-scale service delivery programs, like the one described by Mary Stuart, have been plagued historically by methodological, substantive, and, sometimes, political problems. The program originators who create, develop, and oversee the implementation of their work often do not have the resources, time, or research skills to evaluate the program carefully. Moreover, a series of issues often compromises or complicates even the most optimally staffed and funded evaluation efforts.
Author(s): Sherrie H. Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 72, Issue 4 (pages 695–699) Published in 1994