We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
June 1989 (Volume 67)
June 1989 | Avedis Donabedian
E.A. Codman’s conception and development of the “end result idea” in the 1910s are unduly neglected in the history of health care assessment. The “idea” entailed following patients long enough to determine if treatments proved successful and taking comprehensive measures to prevent new failures if outcomes were undesirable. Codman’s work anticipated contemporary approaches to quality monitoring and assurance, establishing accountability, and allocating and managing resources efficiently, among other assessment features. Complexity and ambiguity in health care objectives, decision making, and role responsibilities as well as costs today hinder full application of his vision, but refinement of these factors proceeds in the directions Codman set forth.
Author(s): Avedis Donabedian
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 67, Issue 2 (pages 233–256)
Published in 1989
E.A. Codman and the End Results Idea: A Commentary
The Compression of Morbidity: Near or Far?