The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
S2 1988 (Volume 66)
Quarterly Article
Donald Light
Sol Levine
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 14, 2026
Sep 9, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Technological advances in medicine have greatly enhanced the ability of physicians to treat disease and disability, but, at the same time, changes in the organization and management of health care services in the United States have imposed constraints on their autonomy. How have these changes-medical advancement and professional decline-affected the theoretical concept of the medical profession? Challenging the prevailing model of professional dominance, the concepts of deprofessionalization, corporatization, and proletarianization emphasize the effects of recent social and economic developments on the changing status of the medical profession. There is evidence, however, that what the proponents of these concepts perceive as the profession’s response to external forces are, in fact, the unanticipated consequences of the profession’s campaign for autonomy.
Author(s): Donald Light; Sol Levine
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 66, Issue S2 (pages 10–32) Published in 1988