We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
June 2008 (Volume 86)
June 2008 | Teresa A. Coughlin, Stephen Zuckerman
Context: States have long lobbied to be given more flexibility in designing their Medicaid programs, the nation’s health insurance program for the low-income, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities. The Bush administration and the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 have put in place policies to make it easier to grant states this flexibility. Methods: This article explores trends in states’ Medicaid flexibility and discusses some of the implications for the program and its beneficiaries. The article uses government databases to identify the policy changes that have been implemented through waivers and state plan amendments. Findings: Since 2001, more than half the states have changed their Medicaid programs, through either Medicaid waivers or provisions in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. These changes are in benefit flexibility, cost sharing, enrollment expansions and caps, privatization, and program financing. Conclusions: With a few important exceptions, these changes have been fairly circumscribed, but despite their expressed interest, states have not yet fully used this flexibility for their Medicaid programs. However, states may exercise this newly available flexibility if, for example, the nation’s health care system is not reformed or an economic downturn creates fiscal pressures on states that must be addressed. If this happens, the policies implemented during the Bush administration could lead to profound changes in Medicaid and could be carried out relatively easily.
Author(s): Teresa A. Coughlin;Stephen Zuckerman
Keywords: Medicaid; Medicaid reform; Medicaid waivers; Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 86, Issue 2 (pages 209–240) DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00520.x Published in 2008
A Plan for Action: Key Perspectives from the Racial/Ethnic Disparities Strategy Forum
“Developing Good Taste in Evidence”: Facilitators of and Hindrances to Evidence-Informed Health Policymaking in State Government
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund