The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
March 1993 (Volume 71)
Quarterly Article
Barbara Berney
March 2024
Mar 11, 2024
Feb 27, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Although lead toxicity has been recognized for 2,000 years, knowledge of its neurobehavioral effects, sources of exposure, and risk population has grown dramatically during the last 40 years. In 1950, the level of blood lead believed to be toxic to children was in the range of 60 to 80 micrograms per deciliter. The principal source of poisoning was considered to be lead paint and the risk population was perceived to be poor children living in dilapidated housing. By 1990, epidemiological research had established that lead was ubiquitous. The risk population had expanded to include 17 percent of American children under the age of six. Contributors to the advance of lead research have been the civil rights and environmental movements, improved laboratory techniques, and the availability of large data bases. This article reviews the scientific and political processes that have led to a redefinition of the lead problem.
Author(s): Barbara Berney
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 71, Issue 1 (pages 3–39) Published in 1993
