We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
March 1973 (Volume 51)
March 1973 | Christa Altenstetter
The intent of this article is to present an intensive comparison of one area of health planning, viz., planning for health facilities in the United States and in Germany. In both countries federal legislation increasingly has attempted to achieve comprehensive policies through planning. Most attempts have been markedly influenced by various levels of authority which exist apart from the federal level. In the United States the notion of comprehensive health planning seems to be an indirect outcome of several isolated decisions. In Germany, on the other hand, state and local governments have long accepted health as a public responsibility and have been involved in hospital-related matters within certain limitations, i.e., hospitals have not been directly influenced by centralized decision making. While the German health bureaucracy remains the principal vehicle for hospital decision making, consumer advocacy planning in the American sense does not exist. Health planning in the United States under the Regional Medical Program and Comprehensive Health Planning provides an example of the interaction and interrelatedness of many political factors which influence health planning. Paradoxically, the American health planning process lacks a clear mandate from the consuming public in terms of developing fiscal, political, and legal powers over the subjects to be planned, including hospitals.
Author(s): Christa Altenstetter
Read on JSTOR
Volume 51, Issue 1 (pages 41–71)
Published in 1973
Professional Licensure, Organizational Behavior, and the Public Interest
[Medical Care in the U.S.A.: 1932-1972. Problems, Proposals and Programs from the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care to the Committee for National Health Insurance]: Comments
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund