The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
March 1973 (Volume 51)
March 1973 | I. S. Falk
Current interest in the development of a national health insurance in the United States invites a clear determination of objectives through identification of the problems to be resolved by a new program and an understanding of how these problems came about and why. Historical review of the background and the evolution of the current medical care scene provides perspective. Critical review may also contribute to better design of what should be intended by new undertakings and to utilization of lessons from the past in order that the specifications should minimize mistakes for the future. Here, therefore, is a review of major events and the lessons they taught (or should have taught), from the Final Report of the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care (1932) to Medicare and Medicaid (1965) and their early operational years through 1972. It is a personal review but by an author who was privileged to be a participant in many of the studies and legislative campaigns as well as a continuous observer of the evolving scene. This historical review was planned as prologue to a course of action. The author therefore comments on various current legislative proposals and indicates why he and others advocate the Health Security Bill – principally because its scope embraces not only the financing of comprehensive personal health services for the whole population but, equally and simultaneously, the improvement of the medical care system as well. This review and the presentation of a rationale for action are timely, since diverse and conflicting proposals are now engaging national attention and are being debated in the Congress.
Author(s): I. S. Falk
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 51, Issue 1 (pages 1–32)
Published in 1973
[Medical Care in the U.S.A.: 1932-1972. Problems, Proposals and Programs from the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care to the Committee for National Health Insurance]: Comments
Teaching of Community Medicine in the United States: An Outsider’s View