The Fund supports several networks of state health policymakers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis on topics important to state health policymakers, particularly on issues related to state leadership, primary care, aging, and health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that aims to improve population health by connecting leaders and decision makers with the best available evidence and experience. It does this work by:
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
This paper examines the potential role of prepayment in the publicly financed delivery of health care to the poor under the Medicaid program. After briefly reviewing the theoretical advantages of prepayment for each of the principal participants: provider, funder, and user, the major implementation issues faced over the long term in actually realizing those advantages are discussed. The implementation issues are drawn from the experience gained in negotiations for conversion of the Martin Luther King, Jr., Neighborhood Health Center (MLK) in New York City to prepayment for its Medicaid population, supplemented by the results of the two large-scale Medicaid prepayment programs now in operation in New York City and California. The principal issues include (1) enrollment growth and rate of turnover, (2) underutilization of services, (3) out-of-plan use of services, (4) regulations of the quality of care, and (5) failure of the prepayment economic incentive. Two basic approaches to dealing with these issues are presented: a strong contractual agreement between the public agency and provider, and regular evaluation of the program. The major features of the Medicaid prepayment contract recently negotiated with MLK which attempts to ease these problems are reviewed in detail.
Author(s): James Hester; Elliot Sussman
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 52, Issue 4 (pages 415–444) Published in 1974
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
The Milbank Quarterly’s multidisciplinary approach and commitment to applying the best empirical research to practical policymaking offers in-depth assessments of the social, economic, political, historical, legal, and ethical dimensions of health and health care policy.