The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, healthy aging, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
Jeanne M. Lambrew
Sep 25, 2023
Sep 18, 2023
Sep 14, 2023
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
In 2003, President Bush proposed converting Medicaid from an entitlement to a block grant program. Similar ideas from President Reagan in 1981 and Congress in 1995 were introduced but not enacted. Block grants aim to provide greater federal budget certainty and a stronger state incentive to contain program costs. This paper compares the preestablished funding levels proposed in 1981 and 1995 with what actually happened to federal Medicaid spending. Its results show that previous block grant proposals’ funding levels at the national and state levels were quite different from what was anticipated and what occurred. As a result, Medicaid probably could not – and cannot – maintain existing health coverage under a block grant financing structure.
Author(s): Jeanne M. Lambrew
Keywords: Medicaid; health care financing; entitlements; health reform
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 83, Issue 1 (pages 41–63) DOI: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2005.00335.x Published in 2005
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
The Milbank Quarterly’s multidisciplinary approach and commitment to applying the best empirical research to practical policymaking offers in-depth assessments of the social, economic, political, historical, legal, and ethical dimensions of health and health care policy.