We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
November 4, 2019
November 2019 | David A. Rochefort | Early View, Original Scholarship
Context: Originating at the county level in Wisconsin in the early 1970s, Assertive Community Treatment is one of the most influential mental health programs ever developed. The subject of hundreds of research studies and recipient of enthusiastic backing from private advocacy organizations and government agencies, the program has spread widely across the United States and internationally as a package of resources and management techniques for supporting individuals with severe and chronic mental illness in the community. Today, however, ACT is associated with a rising tide of criticism challenging the program’s practices and philosophy while alternative service models are advancing.
Methods: To trace the history of the Assertive Community Treatment movement, a diffusion‐of‐innovation framework was applied based on relevant concepts from public policy analysis, organizational behavior, implementation science, and other fields. In‐depth review of the literature on ACT design, management, and performance also provided insight into the program’s creation and subsequent evolution across different settings.
Findings: A number of factors have functioned to fuel and to constrain ACT diffusion. The former category includes policy learning through research; the role of policy entrepreneurs; ACT’s acceptance as a normative standard; and a thriving international epistemic community. The latter category includes cost concerns, fidelity demands, shifting norms, research contradictions and gaps, and a multifactorial context affecting program adoption. Currently, the program stands at a crossroads, strained by the principle of adherence to a long‐standing operational framework, on the one hand, and calls to adjust to an environment of changing demands and opportunities, on the other.
Conclusions: For nearly 50 years, Assertive Community Treatment has been a mainstay of community mental health programming in the United States and other parts of the world. This presence will continue, but not in any static sense. A growing number of hybrid and competing versions of the program are likely to develop to serve specialized clientele groups and to respond to consumer demands and the recovery paradigm in behavioral health care.
Keywords: Assertive Community Treatment, policy diffusion, community mental health care, community support systems, deinstitutionalization, recovery model, evidence-based practice.
Read on Wiley Online Library
Published in 2019 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12429
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund