The Fund supports several networks of state health policymakers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis on topics important to state health policymakers, particularly on issues related to state leadership, primary care, aging, and total costs of care.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
September 1998 (Volume 76)
Paul D. Cleary
Milbank Memorial Fund
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Periodically, individuals or groups ask me if the Milbank Quarterly is interested in publishing a group of papers from a conference. Although the Quarterly always is interested in publishing high-quality papers grounded in research and pertinent to policy, I usually discourage such persons for two reasons. First, conferences tend to address a wide range of issues, and policy is often not the focus of the papers. Second, conferences frequently elicit papers of uneven quality. All articles published in the Quarterly have been reviewed, using double-blinded procedures, and my experience is that many conference papers are not found acceptable using such a process. When Robert P. Huefner and Norman J. Waitzman sent me these papers, which were presented at a special conference on social and economic disparities in health at the University of Utah in 1996, I found that they focused more on policy implications than is usually the case with research on this topic. I also considered the quality of the papers to be uniformly higher than most collections of conference papers. Fortunately, we were able to accept most of the articles for publication in this issue, following our standard review process.
Socioeconomic gradients have been remarkably persistent throughout the world. As Huefner and Waitzman discuss in their introduction, disparities exist across the full socioeconomic spectrum. The finding that socioeconomic deprivation leads to poor health is widely accepted. However, epidemiologists and health researchers have been surprised to learn that, even among persons earning comfortable salaries, there are striking differences in health status between persons of different ranks within the job hierarchy. The work of Michael Marmot and his colleagues who conducted the Whitehall study on health differences among civil service employees in the United Kingdom provided dramatic evidence of this phenomenon.
Research conducted during this decade on how to improve health has focused on clinical interventions to modify individual behavior, ranging from eating habits to the use of tobacco products. These efforts have been useful but have not been matched by research designed to understand and modify the aspects of social environments that lead to poorer health (Marmot 1998). The authors and I hope that this issue of the Milbank Quarterly will stimulate more research on this topic and encourage policy makers to think about how to reduce social inequalities in health.
Reference Marmot, M.G. 1998. Improvement of Social Environment to Improve Health. Lancet 351:57-60.
Author(s): Paul D. Cleary
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 76, Issue 3 (pages 309–310) DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00041-i10 Published in 1998
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
The Milbank Quarterly’s multidisciplinary approach and commitment to applying the best empirical research to practical policymaking offers in-depth assessments of the social, economic, historical, legal, and ethical dimensions of health and health care policy.