The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
March 1975 (Volume 53)
Quarterly Article
Jacqueline K. Corn
September 2026
Sep 25, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Concepts of health risk associated with lead usage have undergone profound change. In the past observations of the relationship between lead usage and lead poisoning were severely limited by lack of knowledge and the relatively small quantity of the metal used. The benefits of lead usage, when contrasted with the risk incurred, outweighed the known hazards. Industrial growth contributed to the increased interest in lead poisoning. A significant increase of workers at risk generated new interest in an old disease. A concept of control developed based upon the principle of a dose-response relationship. The old idea of benefit versus risk remained because technological society needed lead but agreed that by controlling the factory environment lead could be used safely. The criteria for injury remained clinical plumbism. Growth and change in lead utilization, once again, brought lead hazard to the forefront. New applications distributed lead throughout the environment exposing both workers and the general population. A segment of the scientific community now suggests that the old criteria to judge risk, clinical symptoms of plumbism, are inadeauate.
Author(s): Jacqueline K. Corn
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 53, Issue 1 (pages 93–114) Published in 1975