The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
March 2006 (Volume 84)
March 2006 | M. Susan Ridgely, M. Audrey Burnam, Colleen L. Barry, Howard H. Goldman, Kevin D. Hennessy
The government often uses the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program as a model for both public and private health policy choices. In 2001, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) implemented full parity, requiring that FEHB carriers offer mental health and substance abuse benefits equal to general medical benefits. OPM instructed carriers to alter their benefit design but permitted them to determine whether they would manage care and what structures or processes they would use. This article reports on the experience of 156 carriers and the government-wide BlueCross and BlueShield Service Benefit Plan. Carriers dropped cost-restraining benefit limits. A smaller percentage also changed the management of the benefit, but these changes affected the care of many enrollees, making the overall parity effect noteworthy.
Author(s): M. Susan Ridgely; M. Audrey Burnam; Colleen L. Barry; Howard H. Goldman; Kevin D. Hennessy
Keywords: parity; managed care; behavioral health; health insurance
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 84, Issue 1 (pages 201–218)
Published in 2006
Notes on Contributors
Stories from the Sharp End: Case Studies in Safety Improvement