The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports and issues briefs on topics important to population health.
September 2006 (Volume 84)
September 2006 | Michelle M. Mello, David M. Studdert, Allen B. Kachalia, Troyen A. Brennan | Featured Article
Proposals that medical malpractice claims be removed from the tort system and processed in an alternative system, known as administrative compensation or ‘health courts,’ attract considerable policy interest during malpractice ‘crises,’ including the current one. This article describes current proposals for the design of a health court system and the system’s advantages for improving patient safety. Among these advantages are the cultivation of a culture of transparency regarding medical errors and the creation of mechanisms to gather and analyze data on medical injuries. The article discusses the experiences of foreign countries with administrative compensation systems for medical injury, including their use of claims data for research on patient safety; choices regarding the compensation system’s relationship to physician disciplinary processes; and the proposed system’s possible limitations.
Author(s): Michelle M. Mello; David M. Studdert; Allen B. Kachalia; Troyen A. Brennan
Keywords: liability; malpractice; patient safety; discipline
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 84, Issue 3 (pages 459–492)
Published in 2006
Promoting Declines in the Prevalence of Late-Life Disability: Comparisons of Three Potentially High-Impact Interventions
In This Issue