The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 1974 (Volume 52)
Quarterly Article
James F. Blumstein
September 2026
Sep 25, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
For years, open discussion of fertility issues in governmental circles was taboo. Recognition of the effect of population growth in countries receiving United States economic aid and political maturation of the environmental movement gave added impetus to consideration of fertility issues. Increasing visibility, however, was accompanied by confusion. Some sought governmental initiatives aimed at reducing or stabilizing aggregate population size; others supported family-planning programs for the poor as a component of the Great Society, with emphasis on atomistic goals such as maternal and child health and parental choice in determining family size. Not only do goals and orientation differ, but also there is disagreement about the demographic evidence. Some argue that programs aimed at promoting choice and focused on the poor will achieve population stability while others believe such a limited target will not achieve populationist goals and indeed will run the risk of criticism as race or class legislation. So far, domestic legislation has conformed to atomistic family goals, focusing on the poor, but the current administration seems to be backing away from its commitment in line with a general de-emphasis of categorical programs. It may be that only by joining forces can family planners and population controllers resist erosion of previous political gains.
Author(s): James F. Blumstein
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 52, Issue 2 (pages 131–168) Published in 1974