We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
December 1993 (Volume 71)
December 1993 | Diane E. Hoffmann
More than 60 percent of hospitals have ethics committees. The widescale, voluntary adoption of these committees by hospitals is surprising, given the lack of data on their effectiveness. Little effort has been made to evaluate such committees, in part because of the lack of consensus on their purpose. The argument presented here is that, from a policy perspective, the committees’ purpose must be to safeguard patients’ interests; a framework for evaluating committees based on that objective is outlined. The criteria for evaluation include access, quality, and cost effectiveness. Existing data are used to assess ethics committees, using these criteria. Based on available data, it is questionable whether ethics committees are performing any better or worse than alternative mechanisms to achieve the same goal.
Author(s): Diane E. Hoffmann
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 71, Issue 4 (pages 677–701)
Published in 1993
Notes on Contributors
Must We Forgo Informed Consent to Control Health Care Costs? A Response to Mark A. Hall
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund