The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
The Future of Population Health
Mark D. Hayward
Mateo P. Farina
Feb 27, 2024
Feb 7, 2024
Jan 3, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Greater educational attainment is strongly associated with better health. Research has found this association across many world regions,1–4 social contexts,5–9 social groups,10–13 and historical periods.14–19 This association is not limited to one health outcome, but has been documented for an array of important measures, including self-rated health, biological risk, chronic conditions, mental health, mortality, and physical and cognitive functioning.20–27 The evidence has been consistent and voluminous, leading to the wide acceptance of this association as one of the leading social scientific “truths.”
Despite this enormous body of research, the question of how education influences health outcomes continues to generate a significant amount of research interest. In large part, researchers’ attention to this association reflects the growing recognition that the association is highly malleable. Research has shown that while more years of education are associated with better health, the magnitude of the association can vary widely, for example, across countries, within country administrative units such as states and provinces, across race/ethnic and gender groups, and across birth cohorts.8,10,12,28–30 These differences are leading researchers to consider how and why this malleability exists. Why and how do administrative units and social categories impact the association? Are there mechanisms at the institutional and individual levels (or combinations thereof) that can help us understand this dynamism? How is the education health association embedded in nested institutional contexts reflecting families, communities, institutions, and policies?31,32
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
The Milbank Quarterly is an editorially independent multidisciplinary journal that offers in-depth assessments of the social, economic, political, historical, legal, and ethical dimensions of health and health care policy.