The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
March 2005 (Volume 83)
March 2005 | Trisha Greenhalgh
I agree with Drs. Badgett and Pugh that complexity science is an excellent explanatory model for analyzing the spread of innovation in service organizations, for precisely the reasons they have outlined. Table 1 of our article lists “complexity studies” as one of 13 research traditions that contributed to our systematic review. But the other 12 traditions provided additional insights that enriched our overall model. Depending on the example being considered, any one (or more) of these traditions might provide a useful “lens” through which to analyze a situation, explain empirical findings, consider ways forward, and estimate the likely success of interventions. The “lens” of complex systems is, of course, particularly helpful when the example being considered lies to the far left of our Figure 2. It is less fit for this purpose in other (perhaps less common) circumstances.
Author(s): Trisha Greenhalgh
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 83, Issue 1 (pages 178–179)
Published in 2005
Notes on Contributors
To the Editor