We focus on a number of topic areas identified by state health policy leaders as important to population health.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. Get the latest from thought leaders, including Christopher F. Koller, president of the Fund.
We publish The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to population health.
The Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University is a national leader in evidence-based decision making and policy design.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
June 2008 (Volume 86)
June 2008 | Roderick K. King, Alexander R. Green, Aswita Tan-McGrory, Elizabeth J. Donahue, Jessie Kimbrough-Sugick, Joseph R. Betancourt
Context: Racial and ethnic disparities in health care in the United States have been well documented, with research largely focusing on describing the problem rather than identifying the best practices or proven strategies to address it. Methods: In 2006, the Disparities Solutions Center convened a one-and-a-half-day Strategy Forum composed of twenty experts from the fields of racial/ethnic disparities in health care, quality improvement, implementation research, and organizational excellence, with the goal of deciding on innovative action items and adoption strategies to address disparities. The forum used the Results Based Facilitation model, and several key recommendations emerged. Findings: The forum’s participants concluded that to identify and effectively address racial/ethnic disparities in health care, health care organizations should: (1) collect race and ethnicity data on patients or enrollees in a routine and standardized fashion; (2) implement tools to measure and monitor for disparities in care; (3) develop quality improvement strategies to address disparities; (4) secure the support of leadership; (5) use incentives to address disparities; and (6) create a messaging and communication strategy for these efforts. This article also discusses these recommendations in the context of both current efforts to address racial and ethnic disparities in health care and barriers to progress. Conclusions: The Strategy Forum’s participants concluded that health care organizations needed a multifaceted plan of action to address racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Although the ideas offered are not necessarily new, the discussion of their practical development and implementation should make them more useful.
Author(s): Roderick K. King; Alexander R. Green; Aswita Tan-McGrory; Elizabeth J. Donahue; Jessie Kimbrough-Sugick; Joseph R. Betancourt
Keywords: disparities; quality improvement; minority health; race; ethnicity; access; disease management; data collection
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 86, Issue 2 (pages 241–272) DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00521.x Published in 2008
Population Causes and Consequences of Leading Chronic Diseases: A Comparative Analysis of Prevailing Explanations
State Responses to New Flexibility in Medicaid
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund