The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
May 6, 2026
Quarterly Article
Michael Shepherd
Bethany Albertson
Mar 10, 2026
March 2026
December 2025
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Politics is increasingly important to many Americans. Yet little is known about how the increasing centrality of politics affects Americans’ mental health. This work aimed to evaluate how recent polarized elections have influenced Americans’ mental health.
Methods: To investigate this question, we compared online search interest in politically related mental health issues and self-reported mental health data. Analyses explored changes before and after election days in 2020 and 2024. The two outcome variables were aggregate Google search interest in politics-related mental health issues and individual responses to the following item from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): ʻʻNow thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good? With BRFSS, we compared differential changes for likely Democrats and Republicans using multiple proxy measures and for those with health policy interest in the election.
Findings: The 2020 and 2024 presidential elections substantially increased interest in politics-related mental health issues online. The 2020 election led to just under 0.2 additional days of poor mental health (P < .05), and the 2024 election led to just under 0.5 additional days of poorer mental health (P < .05). Likely losing partisans and those who stood to lose out from Trump’s reelection in terms of health policy were found to drive most of this relationship, with just under 1 full additional day of poorer mental health for each group.
Conclusions: The stakes of elections in this polarized era of American politics are worsening the mental health of Americans. Additional resources may be necessary to allow therapists and clinicians to navigate additional care-seeking surrounding and following elections.
