The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
March 3, 2026
Quarterly Article
Margaret H. Swenson
Lauren D. Boczkowski
Brad Riley
K. Noelle Broughton
Christopher J. Koliba
Feb 18, 2026
December 2025
Mental Health and Substance Use Challenges
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Racial disparities—unequal outcomes between racial groups—persist in the United States, particularly with respect to health and economic outcomes. There has been increased focus on the ways in which upstream determinants of health contribute to these disparities; however, little is known about how forced inaction on these upstream determinants affects health and economic outcomes. The prevalence of state preemption—when state lawmakers restrict policy actions among local decision-makers—is increasing. Therefore, it is essential to understand how restricting local policymaking affects racial disparities in health and economic outcomes.
Methods: This study examines the associations of state preemption with childhood poverty levels and low birthweight. The data for low birthweight were collected from 1,377 counties, and the data for childhood poverty were collected from 1,607 counties. We used ordinary least squares regression and spatial regression to analyze racial disparities in these two outcomes. Furthermore, we used seemingly unrelated estimation to determine whether the effects of state preemption differed significantly between Black and White models for each outcome.
Findings: The results indicated that state preemption is significantly associated with higher rates of low birthweight among Black residents. Specifically, each additional preemptive policy was associated with a .5 percentage-point increase in the low birthweight rate among Black residents. State preemption was also significantly associated with higher rates of childhood poverty among both Black and White residents. Specifically, each additional preemptive policy was associated with a 5 percentage-point and a 1.4 percentage-point higher rate of childhood poverty among Black residents and White residents, respectively. Additional testing of childhood poverty models confirms that the association was stronger in the Black model than the White model.
Conclusions: This study reveals that state preemption of local policymaking on social determinants of health may exacerbate racial disparities in health and economic outcomes. To minimize these disparities and increase health equity, state policymakers should consider the current findings before restricting local policymaking.
