The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
February 27, 2026
Quarterly Article
Maryssa Pallis
Jane L. Tavares
Reena Sethi
Kerry Glova
Marc A. Cohen
Feb 18, 2026
December 2025
September 2025
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: About 280,000 older adults experience the “Medicare Cliff” each year, becoming eligible for Medicare and losing Medicaid coverage when they turn age 65 years due to discontinuities in financial eligibility criteria. Yet, little is known about the long-term associations between a loss in Medicaid coverage and health status, health care utilization, and economic status in later life. Our study builds on previous research by longitudinally examining how health outcomes, health utilization measures, and out-of-pocket medical expenses change when people experience the Medicare Cliff compared with those who maintain their coverage and those who experience temporary disruptions in coverage.
Methods: Using longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study over the period 1998-2020, we tracked individuals over a 10-year follow-up period from when they first became eligible for Medicare.
Findings: Our analysis indicated that even though respondents with Medicaid prior to Medicare eligibility started with better health overall, permanent loss of Medicaid was associated with poorer health outcomes and higher mortality relative to those who kept Medicaid or had a temporary disruption. Permanent loss of Medicaid was also negatively associated with appropriate health care utilization and positively associated with higher out-of-pocket health care spending relative to those who kept Medicaid or had a temporary disruption.
Conclusions: Findings show that experiencing the Medicare Cliff is associated with a range of negative outcomes, including increases in overall health care expenditures relative to those who maintain Medicaid eligibility or only lose it temporarily. Addressing the Medicare Cliff issue would therefore lead to improved health outcomes and reduced health care costs. Our analysis provides a strong basis for policymakers to address this coverage discontinuity through specific policies related to Medicaid financial eligibility rules and access to Medicare Savings Plans to financially protect older adults.