The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
July 29, 2026
Quarterly Article
Naomi Clemmons
Lea Ayers LaFave
Milton Kotelchuck
Arthur R. James
Jun 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2026
June 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Public health prevention initiatives (inclusive of clinical care/services) concerning women have historically pursued two relatively independent tracks: a maternal and child health (MCH) track and a family planning track. While not so far apart from one another, their language, practice, and policy have kept MCH and family planning services in silos at the expense of providing a comprehensive continuum of care and services for sexual and reproductive health.
Methods: MCH and family planning trajectories were examined as complex adaptive systems through policy examples, their intended and unintended impacts on population health, and the emergence of recent strategies that provide a vision for a more integrated system of care that promotes whole-person health.
Findings: MCH and family planning policies were driven by poverty and civil rights, established to realize the potential for “longer term economic development.”The development of each track was, and continues to be, an adaptive response to social needs, and medical and technological advancements. An emerging “new order” that recognizes the importance of a whole-person approach to address the impact of social determinants on health is needed. Such systems transformation is driven by focused commitment to transform functions and structures to respond to a changing environment. Integration provides a wider range of services and enables patients to benefit from the expertise of multidisciplinary teams.
Conclusions: Mitigating disparities requires a comprehensive systems transformation that promotes quaternary prevention and supports better alignment and integration of MCH/sexual and reproductive health. The process of establishing practice based on system thinking, in service of health equity, must become the new normal.