The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
July 30, 2026
Quarterly Article
Christina Laternser
Jul 29, 2026
Jun 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Geographic gaps in hospital-based obstetric services are often framed as “maternity care deserts,” emphasizing community vulnerability and motivating targeted investments. This study was conducted to test whether service geography is more closely aligned with an operational feasibility regime: the birth volume and workforce capacity associated with the observed presence of obstetric services.
Methods: A national county-year panel (2015-2023) was constructed and used to compare vulnerability-oriented versus feasibility-oriented explanations for the presence of obstetric services. Feasibility was measured using prior-year birth volume and physician workforce supply, as well as their interaction (ln[births] × workforce). Logistic regression models were estimated with county-clustered standard errors, and non-nested specifications were compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion. Analyses were also stratified by metropolitan status.
Findings: Feasibility-based specifications were found to substantially outperform vulnerability-only models (ΔAIC > 10,000). A hybrid specification including feasibility inputs and maternal vulnerability achieved the strongest overall fit, indicating that vulnerability contributes explanatory information conditional on observed feasibility conditions. In nonmetropolitan counties, an increase in the birth volume from the 25th to the 75th percentile was associated with a 41 percentage point increase in the predicted presence of services, compared with 20 percentage points for a corresponding change in the workforce.
Conclusions: Obstetric service distribution was found to be most consistent with a hybrid structure in which feasibility-related inputs aligned more strongly with the presence of services and vulnerability contributed additional explanatory information conditional on those inputs. These findings suggest that vulnerability-targeted approaches may imply different policy approaches than interventions targeting observed operational conditions. Within settings consistent with observed feasibility conditions, or where operational arrangements are modified, vulnerability gradients can guide where stabilization investments are most needed.
