The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 12, 2026
Quarterly Article
Michael Shepherd
March 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Rural and urban areas have diverged significantly in health care access and health outcomes over the last four decades. Federal and state policies have played important roles in shaping these trends.
Methods: I qualitatively review previous and existing federal and state policies that have shaped contemporary rural-urban health disparities. I review academic literature on recent policy enactments that have shown promise for alleviating some rural health struggles as well as scholarship on how the politics of rural health have stymied better policymaking.
Findings: Large scale federal investments (e.g., the Hill-Burton Act) were required to bring modern health care to rural communities in the first place, but inadequate and nonuniversal policies enacted since the 1970s and the increasing corporatization of health care over the last decades have led to withering rural health care access. The recent “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” will likely make these matters worse. Policies that have expanded telehealth and mobile health access, as well as subsidized rural transportation services and changes to public payer reimbursement policies, have provided some optimism. However, the broader politics of rural health limit policy opportunities.
Conclusion: Rural health has suffered, in part, due to state and federal policy failures. While some incremental changes have certainly shown evidence of potential improvements, a more radical policy agenda may be needed to maintain or improve health care access in rural communities. There is mixed-to-negative evidence regarding whether the political environment will allow for sufficient policy improvements.