The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 2025 (Volume 103)
Quarterly Article
Michael J. Yedidia
Joel C. Cantor
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 19, 2026
Jun 29, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Cross-sector collaborations among health care and housing services organizations promise more efficient use of resources and delivery of more coherent and effective services to people experiencing homelessness (PEH). This study analyzes challenges and strategies reported by those currently implementing cross-sector programs.
Methods: Data were collected through in-depth interviews with staff of health care and housing services at eight programs systematically selected to typify the scope and nature of cross-sector collaborations in New Jersey. Respondents included administrators (n = 14) and frontline providers (n = 10). Questions focused on motivations to collaborate, approaches to sustaining partnerships and managing operations, mechanisms for financing services across sectors, and strategies for effectively engaging PEH in health care services. Interviews were audio-recorded and inductively analyzed using standard qualitative techniques.
Findings: Collaborations were motivated by the impact of housing on health, the ineffectiveness and costs of attempting to address unmet health care needs in the absence of providing shelter, and the promise of harnessing resources from both sectors. Accounts of successful approaches for engaging PEH in health care services had four fundamentals in common: establishing rapport through matching client preferences with readily achievable options, maintaining intensive interaction, initiating outreach where clients are, and co-locating health and housing services. Favored policies for promoting effective implementation included financing case management services through contract or capitation arrangements, resolving ambiguities in licensing regulations and reimbursement practices that impede co-location of services, securing direct financing for delivery of nursing services at shelters, and providing greater support for frontline providers.
Conclusions: The programs’ accumulated experiences in successfully implementing cross-sector programs yielded valuable insights for other organizations seeking to mount similar initiatives and for creating a more hospitable policy environment for programs to succeed. Policies of the new federal administration may raise new challenges but are unlikely to diminish the importance of lessons for achieving effective cross-sector collaboration.