The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 2025 (Volume 103)
Quarterly Article
Amanda I. Mauri
Zoe Lindenfeld
Charley Willison
THERESE L. TODD
Jonathan Purtle
DIANA SILVER
December 2025
Mental Health and Substance Use Challenges
September 2025
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Individuals with behavioral health disorders are more likely to experience substantial harm from a police encounter, prompting reforms to minimize encounters between police and people experiencing a behavioral health crisis. One strategy involves expanding partnerships between certified community behavioral health clinic (CCBHC) mobile crisis teams and emergency response systems, often through two models: 911 referral, wherein a CCBHC’s behavioral health practitioner–only team responds to 911 calls, and co-response, wherein a CCBHC clinician joins a police or emergency medical services (EMS) team. We examine whether the internal capacity of the CCBHC and external police capacity influence when CCBHCs engage in these partnerships.
Methods: Using data from the only national survey of CCBHCs, this study applies multivariable logistic regression to assess whether CCBHC staff capacity and police capacity are associated with CCBHC–emergency response system partnerships in mobile crisis, controlling for organizational characteristics of the CCBHC and demographic and socioeconomic features of its service area.
Findings: One-third (33.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.0-40.0) of CCBHCs report a 911 referral partnership, and nearly half (48.5%, 95% CI 41.1-55.9) report a co-response arrangement. While police capacity is not significantly associated with co-response, a one standard deviation increase in police capacity corresponds to an 11.0-percentage-point (95% CI −19.5 to −2.5) decrease in the predicted probability of a 911 referral partnership. CCBHC capacity is not associated with 911 referral arrangements, but CCBHCs in the top tertile of CCBHC capacity are 19.2 (95% CI 4.3-34.2) percentage points more likely to report a co-response partnership.
Conclusions: The internal capacity of CCBHCs and external police capacity are associated with when CCBHCs partner with emergency response systems in mobile crisis. Because a robust behavioral health crisis system likely requires multiple response models with varying police involvement, stakeholders may need different strategies depending on the type of partnership they aim to expand.