The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
February 27, 2024
Report
Yalda Jabbarpour
Anuradha Jetty
Hoon Byun
Anam Siddiqi
Stephen Petterson
Jeongyoung Park
Publication
Dec 10, 2024
Dec 2, 2024
Nov 25, 2024
Back to Publications
Technology has the potential to expand primary care access and strengthen primary care delivery. Patient portals can allow for asynchronous care, and the electronic health record (EHR) can make population health management more accessible for primary care clinicians. Telehealth can expand access to populations who have limited transportation, time off from work, or child care. Furthermore, EHR interoperability can improve care coordination across clinical settings and partnerships with public health and community-based organizations to foster comprehensive, whole-person care. Yet, if not designed, implemented, or supported adequately — and if the entire team is not involved in managing it — technology can worsen administrative burden for primary care clinicians, further fragmenting care and burning out an already overburdened workforce. In fact, recent data from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) show that 16% of family physicians report spending four or more hours per day outside of patient care on EHRs.74
If not designed, implemented, or supported adequately – and if the entire team is not involved in managing it – technology can worsen administrative burden for primary care clinicians, further fragmenting care and burning out an already overburdened workforce.
Poor “usability” may account for some of the time spent. In 2022 over 40% of family physicians gave a poor or fair rating to the “ease of finding relevant information” in their EHR (Figure 10). And half of those surveyed gave those same low scores when rating the usefulness of alerts from their EHR (Figure 10). Not surprisingly, one-quarter of family physicians were dissatisfied with their EHR (Figure 11). Although HIT has the potential to improve access for patients, these data suggest that HIT is currently a contributor to the access problem.
Data Source: American Board of Family Medicine recertification exam, 2022Notes: A total of 2,117 respondents completed the EHR usability questions.74
Data Source: American Board of Family Medicine recertification exam, 2022Notes: A total of 4,261 respondents completed the EHR satisfaction questions.74
This data could help explain why patients report access to primary clinicians is diminishing; increased workload requirements are reducing the size of patient panels that clinical teams are able to effectively manage.