The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, healthy aging, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
February 21, 2023
Sep 26, 2023
Sep 18, 2023
Sep 13, 2023
Back to Publications
To implement high-quality primary care, it is important to identify the components of high quality care, study how best to implement the components, and measure its impact on outcomes. To this end, the NASEM report said research on primary care systems, delivery models, and quality of primary care must be supported. Traditionally, funding dedicated to primary care research has been limited, and investments in federal agencies that are tasked with researching primary care have been tenuous and inadequate.30, 31
From 2017 to 2021, the percentage of National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding allocated to family medicine has remained flat at just above 0.2% (Figure 8). Although family medicine is not the only primary care specialty, we chose it for this measure because it is the specialty with the highest number of health care encounters in the United States.32 Moreover, tracking research funding related to primary care for internal medicine and pediatrics is difficult because some of that research covers subspecialties and/or focuses on inpatient settings. It’s also important to acknowledge that agencies other than the NIH support primary care research. Still, an in-depth analysis conducted by RAND using a more complex methodology to define primary care research and looking at more federal agencies found similar results.33
Tracking the research dollars that are invested in studying primary care will allow for accountability and should result in a shift of federal research dollars toward studying the only specialty that has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality and improve the health of the population.34
30. Lucan SC, Phillips RL, Bazemore AW. Off the roadmap? Family medicine’s grant funding and committee representation at NIH. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(6):534-542. doi:10.1370/afm.911 31.Mainous A, Porter M, Agana D, Chessman A. Institutional NIH research funding and a culture of support for family medicine—their relationship to family medicine specialty choice. Fam Med. 2018;50(5):369-371. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2018.913629 32. Willis J, Antono B, Bazemore A, et al. The State of Primary Care in the United States: A Chartbook of Facts and Statistics. Robert Graham Center; 2021.https://www.graham-center.org/content/dam/rgc/documents/publications-reports/reports/PrimaryCareChartbook2021.pdf 33.Mendel P, Gidengil C, Tomoaia-Cotisel A, et al. Health Services and Primary Care Research Study: Comprehensive Report. RAND Corporation; 2020. doi:10.7249/RR3229 34. Basu S, Berkowitz SA, Phillips RL, Bitton A, Landon BE, Phillips RS. Association of primary care physician supply with population mortality in the United States, 2005-2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(4):506-514. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7624
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
An endowed operating foundation that engages in nonpartisan analysis, collaboration, and communication, with an emphasis on state health policy.