The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, healthy aging, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
February 21, 2023
Sep 26, 2023
Sep 18, 2023
Sep 13, 2023
Back to Publications
Achieving high-quality primary care for all will require purposeful steps guided by evidence and data. The results from this first national scorecard suggest the need for dramatic improvements in all categories covered in the NASEM report. While performance on the metrics in this first report are not likely to change dramatically in a year or two, they point to the need to enact policies that support high-quality primary care now and sustain them to see improvements over time.
The goal of this scorecard is to give the nation a starting point both for policy advocacy and accountability measures to help ensure that the United States builds a strong foundation of primary care. Today’s primary care clinicians struggle with insufficient payment, not enough trainees entering the workforce, and inadequate funding for community-based training and research needed to sustain and advance the field. Examining performance on each of the measures can inform federal and state official decisions about relative weaknesses and strengths – and help identify policy priorities. (See Strategies for Implementing High-Quality Primary Care below.)
The ideal number or percentage for any of these measures – the percentage of health care dollars going to primary care spending, the percentage of primary care payment based on capitation, the supply of primary care clinicians, and the percentage of research funding going to primary care – is not fully understood. However, it’s abundantly clear that, in each circumstance, there is a need for improvement and reduced variation in performance across regions and populations, as well as more research.
In addition, the report highlights the need for improved data collection and analytics to better assess support for high-quality primary care at the national and state levels. As outlined in detail in Appendix B, additional data are needed to provide a complete and accurate picture of the supply and training of all members of the primary care workforce (not just physicians); the percentage of primary care payment that combines fee-for-service and capitation in ways that support high-quality, whole-patient care; or the impact of information technology on the patient and the provider. Given data gaps and limitations, more progress in measurement will need to be made to fully track progress toward the NASEM report’s objectives. Over time, as the measures included in the scorecard are refined, subsequent scorecards will be able to assess noteworthy trends and score performance nationally and, for some measures, across states.
The United States spends more per capita on health care than any other developed nation yet has the worst health outcomes.35 To move from an inefficient health care system to one that meets everyone’s needs, we need to build a stronger foundation of high-quality primary care. Monitoring and reporting on national and state progress toward achieving high-quality primary care is an essential step toward accountability and positive change.
Along with recommending a primary care scorecard to ensure accountability for the implementation of high-quality primary care, the NASEM report offered recommendations to help strengthen support for primary care. Some of these recommendations are listed below.
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Implementing High-Quality Primary Care: Rebuilding the Foundation of Health Care. The National Academies Press; 2021. doi:10.17226/25983
35. OECD. Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. OECD; 2017. doi:10.1787/health_glance-2017-en
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
An endowed operating foundation that engages in nonpartisan analysis, collaboration, and communication, with an emphasis on state health policy.