The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 29, 2026
Quarterly Article
Sarah Hamersma
Mitchell McFarlane
Jun 25, 2026
Mental Health and Substance Use Challenges
March 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Context: Able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) are eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for only 3 months in any 36-month period, after which they are subject to a work requirement to continue receiving benefits. Because ABAWDs may later have children, this work requirement for childless adults may affect the health of pregnant women and their infants through the mother’s nutritional well-being prior to pregnancy. The objective of this study was to examine whether temporary county-level waivers of these work requirements improved health outcomes for mothers and their infants.
Methods: This study used restricted National Vital Statistics System natality data from 2004 to 2018, with virtually every birth in the United States in that period, linked at the county-month level to a dataset of ABAWD work-requirement waivers in the year prior to pregnancy. Several binary maternal and infant health outcomes were examined in intent-to-treat analyses using two-way fixed-effects regressions and event studies with application of an estimator robust to heterogeneous treatment effects. The analysis also controlled for economic conditions upon which waiver eligibility is determined.
Findings: Statistically significant increases in adverse birth outcomes were found for first-time mothers exposed to (re-introduced) work requirements just before pregnancy, including a 14% increase in very low birth weight infants and a 10% increase in very preterm births relative to baseline rates. In contrast, the introduction of a waiver was associated with little change in birth outcomes. For maternal outcomes, the removal of a waiver was unexpectedly associated with a significant reduction in eclampsia and a decline in labor inductions. The study found little to no effect of waiver status on other maternal outcomes, such as diabetes or cesarean section rates.
Conclusions: This study found evidence that work requirements for food benefits may harm infant health, particularly when waivers are terminated. These results provide evidence that may inform policymakers weighing the costs and benefits of modifications to ABAWD work requirements.
