The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Supporting networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
Advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources provide relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Upcoming and past Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
The Future of Population Health (Volume 101)
Quarterly Article
Paula Braveman
Jun 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Preterm birth (PTB)—birth before 37 completed weeks of pregnancy—is among the most important indicators of a population’s health. It is the second most common cause of infant mortality in the US population overall1 and the leading cause among African Americans.2 PTB has serious adverse consequences not only in infancy but across the life course; it is a major cause of childhood developmental disability3 and a strong predictor of chronic disease in adulthood.4,5 A large racial disparity in PTB has persisted for decades, with rates among African American/Black women approximately 1.5 to 1.6 times those among European American/White women.6
Unfortunately, the causes of both PTB and the racial disparity in PTB—which are not necessarily the same—are not well established. Despite lack of evidence and/or evidence to the contrary, widespread assumptions have been made about the racial disparity in PTB; as with many health outcomes, “race” has often been assumed by default and without evidence to reflect differences in underlying biology or behaviors.7–9 Evidence has been mounting over the past two decades that calls those assumptions into serious question, however, pointing to racism as a highly plausible upstream—i.e., fundamental—cause of the Black-White disparity in PTB.10
This paper briefly reviews the evidence about biologically plausible causes of the racial disparity in PTB, focusing on racism and associated racial differences in experiences and exposures that are rarely measured in health studies. The terms “race” and “racial” are used here to refer to social groupings according to the large geographic area (often a continent) of an individual’s ancestry. Geographic ancestry often correlates with observable superficial secondary physical characteristics such as skin color, facial features, or hair texture and with differences in the way that people are treated, but has not been associated with fundamental biological differences.11–16