The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, healthy aging, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
October 21, 2021
State Health Policy Leadership Mental Health Medicaid Telehealth
Caroline M. Au-Yeung
Lynn A. Blewett
Mar 15, 2022
Feb 3, 2022
Jun 28, 2021
Back to Publications
A number of federal and state policy changes have been put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. In this brief, we explore these policy changes and recommend that policymakers keep particular changes in place beyond the emergency period. Specifically, policymakers should make permanent (1) federal policies allowing buprenorphine initiation via telemedicine and state policies lifting buprenorphine prescribing restrictions that go beyond federal requirements; (2) federal policies allowing opioid treatment programs to dispense more doses of methadone and state policies lifting methadone dispensing restrictions; and (3) the prohibition of Medicaid prior authorization requirements for MOUD.
Evidence indicates that opioid use disorders (OUDs), overdoses, and overdose deaths escalated as a result of COVID-19-related isolation and economic anxiety; opioid overdose deaths in particular reached record levels in 2020.1–3 At the same time, medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD)—traditionally administered in person through frequent visits (as many as six per week) in clinical settings—became challenging to access during the pandemic because high-frequency clinic visits put patients at increased risk of COVID-19. MOUD—sometimes referred to as medication-assisted treatment, or MAT—is the use of medications to treat OUD, reduce opioid use, and lower the risk of overdose mortality.4 Frequently coupled with counseling and behavioral therapies, MOUD is the most effective OUD treatment and the standard of care for OUD.5
The US Food and Drug Administration has approved three drugs to treat OUD: methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Methadone and buprenorphine are opioids that reduce withdrawal symptoms and cravings while blocking other opioids, like heroin, that can cause overdose. Naltrexone is a nonopioid antagonist that blocks opioids and reduces cravings but cannot treat withdrawal symptoms.6
Even in the year prior to the pandemic, less than 20% of people with OUD received MOUD, despite research showing that medications used to treat OUD are effective.7 To make MOUD more accessible during the COVID-19 pandemic, federal and state policymakers implemented a number of changes to address long-standing legal and regulatory barriers to obtaining MOUD.
Under federal regulations, the initiation of methadone treatment for OUD must take place in a specially licensed clinic called an opioid treatment program (OTP), while buprenorphine and naltrexone can be initiated in a qualified provider’s office or an OTP.8 In either case, the federal Ryan Haight Act of 2008 requires an in-person medical examination before medication therapy can begin.9 Some states exceed these federal requirements and specify a required schedule of subsequent visits as well. In Tennessee, for example, patients must attend weekly office visits during the induction phase of buprenorphine (although these visits are not required to be in person), with additional office visits at two- to four-week intervals for the first year of treatment.10,11
Federal regulatory agencies have made a number of changes to facilitate the delivery of MOUD via telemedicine during the COVID-19 emergency in order to prevent the spread of the virus. Most notably, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) waived the requirement for an in-person examination for individuals who are beginning buprenorphine if an evaluation can be reasonably conducted via telemedicine, including by telephone.12 Methadone still cannot be initiated via telemedicine, but subsequent methadone appointments for established patients can be conducted through telemedicine.13 Some states, such as Indiana and Ohio, that have their own laws in place prohibiting or restricting the prescribing of controlled substances (including buprenorphine) via telemedicine, announced public health emergency exceptions to these state-level rules as well.14,15 Other states, such as Tennessee, have gone a step further, stating that clinicians are “expected” to conduct buprenorphine assessments and follow-ups via telehealth during the public health emergency.16
Federal COVID-19-related telemedicine guidance for MOUD does not address the delivery of accompanying counseling services. However, individual states have issued guidance permitting the use of telemedicine to deliver counseling by OTPs. Pennsylvania issued a statement declaring that OTP substance use disorder (SUD) counselors may provide counseling services through telehealth, including via telephone.17 Similarly, New Jersey’s Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services announced that OTP counseling should be curtailed or provided through telehealth, although telephonic delivery was not addressed.18
Under federal law, naltrexone can be prescribed by any licensed health care provider with prescribing authority, but the prescribing rules are stricter for methadone and buprenorphine, which are opioids and therefore controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act of 2016: A physician must have a DEA registration in any state in which he or she dispenses methadone, and a physician or other qualifying practitioner must receive a DEA waiver (known as an “X waiver”) to prescribe buprenorphine.19
While federal law allows qualified nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PA) to receive an X waiver to prescribe buprenorphine,20 scope of practices laws in roughly half of states prohibit NPs from prescribing buprenorphine unless they are working in collaboration with a waivered physician, and several states explicitly prohibit NPs from prescribing buprenorphine. One state, Kentucky, prohibits PAs from prescribing the drug as well.21
Federal prescribing authority for methadone remains unchanged under COVID-19, but the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued new guidelines in April 2021 for the treatment of OUD with buprenorphine, such that eligible physicians and other qualifying practitioners are exempt from federal certification requirements related to training, counseling, and other ancillary services that are part of the process for obtaining a buprenorphine waiver and can treat up to 30 patients with buprenorphine under this exemption.22 Clinicians must, however, pursue an X waiver under established protocols (i.e., with training) in order to treat more than 30 patients at a time.23
In addition to federal action to expand the number of X-waivered clinicians through training exemptions, some states are encouraging clinicians to apply for an exempt X waiver to prescribe buprenorphine in order to enhance access to treatment during the pandemic. California, for example, is promoting the new exemption to qualified practitioners through its CA Bridge program.24
Federal law specifies that methadone, when prescribed for OUD, can be dispensed only by an OTP and limits unsupervised, or “take-home,” doses of methadone to reduce the risk of misuse and diversion.19 The federal take-home schedule for methadone permits OTP patients to receive one weekly take-home methadone dose for the first 90 days of treatment (in addition to take-home doses allowed during days of clinic closure). A patient may then take home two doses per week after 90 days in treatment, three doses per week after 180 days, a maximum of six doses for the remainder of the first year, a maximum of 14 doses during the second year, and a one-month maximum supply thereafter.8
Some states uphold stricter methadone take-home parameters than the federal schedule. Wisconsin allows no take-home methadone doses for the first 90 days of treatment except the single dose allowed each week for clinic closure. A patient may then take home one dose per week after 90 days in treatment, two doses after 180 days, a maximum of four doses during the remainder of the first year, a maximum of six doses after one year, and a 13-day maximum supply after two years.25
Unlike methadone, buprenorphine for MOUD can, under federal law, be provided through a range of non-OTP service settings, including outpatient clinics, treatment facilities, correctional facilities, and hospitals, all of which can dispense buprenorphine directly to patients or issue prescriptions to be filled by pharmacies—with most clinicians prescribing no more than a 30-day supply. Federal regulations stipulate that a prescription for buprenorphine cannot be refilled more than five times, or filled or refilled more than six months after the date on which the prescription was issued.19
States sometimes impose additional prescription limitations on buprenorphine. In Missouri, for example, midlevel practitioners may issue only a 30-day prescription of buprenorphine and cannot include refills on their prescriptions. In addition, the state limits all patients receiving MOUD to a 90-day supply.26
In response to COVID-19, SAMHSA relaxed the standard federal take-home schedule for methadone in March 2020, informing states that OTPs may dispense up to 28 days of take-home methadone doses to any stable patients (a supply that would have previously required two years of OTP enrollment) and up to 14 days of take-home doses to any patients who are “less stable” but deemed by the OTP to be able to safely handle this number of take-home doses.27 Patients may also receive up to 14 take-home doses of methadone if they have lab-confirmed COVID-19.12 Further, states may choose to allow OTPs to deliver medications to quarantined or otherwise homebound patients who cannot travel, as Ohio and New York have done (Figure 1).28,29
*Counts do not include any take-home doses allowed during days of clinic closure.
Sources: Federal Opioid Treatment Standards, 42 CFR § 8.12 (2015). https://www.govregs.com/regulations/expand/title42_chapterI_part8_subpartC_section8.12#title42_chapterI_part8_subpartC_section8.12. Accessed September 30, 2021; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) Guidance. March 19, 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/otp-guidance-20200316.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2021.
Although methadone take-home restrictions have been loosened under COVID-19, federal refill restrictions affecting buprenorphine and naltrexone remain unchanged. Some states have, however, loosened their own prescription refill and supply restrictions during the COVID-19 emergency. New Hampshire, for example, is allowing pharmacies to dispense refills of up to a 90-day supply of medication, including controlled substances such as buprenorphine, without the authorization of the prescribing provider.30 Similarly, pharmacists in Nevada are authorized to issue emergency refills of up to a 30-day supply of a controlled substance when prescriber authorization cannot be obtained.31
Federal law requires that patients receiving methadone or buprenorphine at an OTP complete a minimum of eight drug tests per year. SAMHSA believes that these toxicology tests are an important component in decision-making around take-home medication privileges, but cautions that treatment decisions should not be based solely on toxicology results.32
Although more than half of states adhere to federal minimums for MOUD toxicology screening, some require more than eight drug tests annually. Most such states require 12 tests, but there are more stringent exceptions. Massachusetts, for example, requires a minimum of 15 tests per year, and Arkansas goes so far as to mandate weekly testing for the first three months of treatment, with patients graduating to a monthly testing schedule only after three months of tests showing no indication of drug abuse.33,34
The DEA has not authorized a suspension of drug testing for OTP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, practitioners must exercise clinical judgment to determine whether drug testing is indicated for a given individual, balancing this requirement against the risks of COVID-19. In many cases, providers did not administer tests during the early phase of the pandemic with the intent to administer required tests later in the year when revised care processes had been established. Indeed, the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) advises that “during a public health emergency, access to life-saving addiction treatment should not be conditional on urine drug testing,” and “requiring patients to present to a health care facility to provide urine samples for urine drug testing may be more harmful than beneficial.”23 Accordingly, ASAM suggests that OTPs in areas or settings where community spread of COVID-19 is occurring consider pausing drug testing altogether, limiting drug testing in cases where testing is still warranted (e.g., patients with unstable OUD), and/or using alternative testing protocols (e.g., collecting specimens outside the treatment facility).23
In a few cases, states have issued their own guidance regarding toxicology screening during the COVID-19 emergency. For example, Washington State Health Care Authority notified the state’s Medicaid program that toxicology testing is not necessary to initiate or continue an individual on buprenorphine, and such testing should be a clinical decision “balancing unnecessary exposure for patients and providers with concerns about persistent use and diversion.”35
Under federal law, OTPs must provide substance abuse counseling “as clinically necessary,” although federal law does not dictate how often counseling must be delivered or the type of counseling that should be offered, and evidence that counseling requirements are efficacious is lacking.8 There are no federal counseling requirements for receiving MOUD outside of an OTP; however, it is recommended that office-based outpatient treatment providers establish linkages within their communities with relevant resources and/or medical subspecialties (e.g., behavioral health).36 ASAM guidance states that refusal to participate in counseling should not preclude or delay starting MOUD.37
State requirements for counseling that accompanies MOUD may be more stringent than federal minimums. Utah exceeds federal requirements, specifying that patients in OTPs must participate in counseling for at least one hour per week for the first 90 days of treatment, for at least two hours per month for the subsequent six months, and once monthly thereafter.38 Indiana law goes one step further, not only specifying a counseling schedule but also stipulating that counseling sessions must include individual counseling in particular.39 The state of Virginia allows individual or group counseling but requires that these sessions be conducted in person.40
The federal government has not made any COVID-19-related modifications to its requirement that OTPs provide counseling in conjunction with MOUD. However, some states with their own counseling specifications have modified these rules due to the pandemic. California is allowing OTPs to make exceptions to the state’s once-monthly counseling requirements as long as the OTP is complying with federal rules.41 West Virginia suspended its counseling requirements altogether for the duration of the federal COVID-19 emergency declaration.42
In all, 54% of nonelderly adults treated for OUD in 2017 were covered by Medicaid (Figure 2), and Medicaid-insured nonelderly adults with OUD were more likely than those with other coverage to receive treatment during this time.43 As the majority payer for OUD treatment, Medicaid has a significant role in determining access to MOUD through coverage and benefit design. The federal SUPPORT Act of 2018 leveraged the ability of the Medicaid program to improve MOUD access by requiring all state Medicaid programs to cover methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone, as well as adjunctive counseling services, effectively ensuring consistent coverage across the country.44 However, the SUPPORT Act did leave open the question of utilization management policies—such as prior authorization rules—around MOUD, which can vary widely from state to state and which may make it more difficult for OUD patients to access these medications when they are ready to seek treatment.45
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. From Orgera K, Tolbert J. The Opioid Epidemic and Medicaid’s Role in Facilitating Access to Treatment. San Francisco, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019. https://files.kff.org/attachment/Issue-Brief-The-Opioid-Epidemic-and-Medicaids-Role-in-Facilitating-Access-to-Treatment.
A 2018 SAMHSA analysis noted that in some states, Medicaid-covered medications for OUD treatment—most commonly buprenorphine—require prior authorization from members’ fee-for-service (FFS) pharmacy benefit plans, a process that can prevent timely access to treatment.46 A subsequent 2019 Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that 21 states either had already relaxed or removed FFS prior authorization requirements to expand access to MOUD and/or planned to do so in fiscal year (FY) 2020.47 However, Medicaid managed care plans (in contrast to FFS plans) are not required to adhere to prior authorization restrictions unless explicitly directed by regulation to do so. Accordingly, more than 40% of Medicaid managed care plans across the country required prior authorization in order to reimburse for methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone in 2018.48
Regardless of an emergency declaration, states have the flexibility to establish and manage pharmaceutical prior authorization processes without approval from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. During an emergency, states can also temporarily suspend prior authorization requirements, extend prior authorizations through the emergency declaration period, and expedite prior authorizations by requiring flexibility in documentation (e.g., optional physician signatures).49 Individual states have leveraged this flexibility to ensure access to prescription medications, including medications for OUD, among Medicaid beneficiaries during the pandemic. Ohio is one such state: its Medicaid program temporarily suspended all prior authorization requirements and extended all existing prior authorization approvals for six months from the renewal or expiration date.50
During the COVID-19 emergency, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have modified their Medicaid policies regarding telehealth to allow for more virtual visits so that in-person interactions are minimized while maintaining access to care.51 States are, variously, offering Medicaid reimbursement for telehealth services at the same payment rates as for in-person visits and extending telehealth policies to cover a wider array of providers than are usually covered by telehealth. North Carolina, for example, offers Medicaid reimbursement for counseling services provided by licensed clinical addiction specialists and peer counselors in conjunction with MOUD.52 Additionally, as of July 2020, all 50 state Medicaid agencies issued guidance to expand “telehealth” to include some form of audio-only interactions so Medicaid can be used to cover telephonic visits. This is a critical benefit for many people with OUD (especially low-income individuals who are homeless or leaving incarceration) who do not have access to laptops and smartphones, and it enhances the already expanded accessibility of buprenorphine treatment in particular, as buprenorphine for OUD can be administered entirely by telehealth during the COVID-19 emergency.51,53
A number of federal and state policy changes have been put in place to improve access to MOUD during the COVID-19 pandemic by modifying the treatment and reimbursement landscape (Table 1). These changes have addressed service delivery, medication-prescribing authority, dispensing rules, prescriptions and refill parameters, counseling requirements, and drug-screening rules. The number and speed of these changes is unprecedented.
The need to expand access to MOUD will not end with the COVID-19 emergency, as the number of individuals in need of treatment far exceeds the capacity of MOUD providers and facilities. Some of the policy changes that have made MOUD more accessible during the pandemic have already been made permanent at the state level (e.g., expanding the definition of “telehealth”). The continuation of other changes will require ongoing support from state and national policymakers. We recommend continued efforts around three regulatory strategies in particular:
Although there are other policy avenues for expanding access to MOUD, these three areas are particularly relevant for reducing logistical barriers to treatment. Evidence and testimony from providers and patients indicates that these mechanisms have been safe and effective during the COVID-19 pandemic and that continuing them beyond the pandemic period is warranted.
1 Strach P, Pérez-Chiqués E, Zuber K. Epidemic in a pandemic: flattening the curve in the opioid crisis. Rockefeller Institute of Government website. https://rockinst.org/issue-areas/opioids/epidemic-in-a-pandemic/. Published 2020. Accessed September 13, 2021. 2 American Medical Association. Issue Brief: Reports of Increases in Opioid Related Overdose and Other Concerns During COVID Pandemic. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2020. http://www.asapnys.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Issue-brief_-Reports-of-increases-in-opioid-related-overdose-and-other-concerns-during-COVID-pandemic.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2021. 3 Ahmad F, Rossen L, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics website. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm. Published August 5, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2021. 4 Medication-assisted treatment (MAT). Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration website. https://www.samhsa.gov/medication-assisted-treatment. Last updated September 16, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2021. 5 Attermann J, Szubiak N, Bailey G. Implementing medication-assisted treatment (MAT): organizational considerations and workflows. Presented at: PCSS MAT Training; May 31, 2017. https://www.thenationalcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Implementing-Medication-assisted-Treatment-MAT-Organizational-Operations-and-Workflows.pdf?daf=375ateTbd56. Accessed October 4, 2021. 6 MAT medications, counseling, and related conditions. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration website. https://www.samhsa.gov/medication-assisted-treatment/medications-counseling-related-conditions. Last updated September 15, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2021. 7 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results From the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt29393/2019NSDUHFFRPDFWHTML/2019NSDUHFFR1PDFW090120.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2021. 8 Federal Opioid Treatment Standards. 42 CFR 1 §8.12 (2015). https://www.govregs.com/regulations/expand/title42_chapterI_part8_subpartC_section8.12#title42_chapterI_part8_subpartC_section8.12. Accessed September 13, 2021. 9 Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act, Pub L No. 110-425 (2008). https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ425/PLAW-110publ425.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 10 Geminn W. Laws, rules and regulations affecting implementation of MAT programs. Presented at: Tennessee Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services. http://rhaot.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/MAT%20Laws.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 11 Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services; Tennessee Department of Health. Tennessee Nonresidential Buprenorphine Treatment Guidelines: Summer 2018 Update. Nashville: Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services and Tennessee Department of Health; 2018. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/mentalhealth/documents/FINAL%20Buprenorphine%20Treatment%20Guidelines-Summer%202018.PDF. Accessed October 4, 2021. 12 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). OTP guidance for patients quarantined at home with the coronavirus. March 30, 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/otp-covid-implementation-guidance.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 13 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). FAQs: Provision of methadone and buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder in the COVID-19 emergency. April 21, 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/faqs-for-oud-prescribing-and-dispensing.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 14 State of Indiana Executive Department. Directives to Manage Indiana’s Health Care Response for Hoosiers with COVID-19 during the Public Health Emergency. Exec. Order No. 20-13 (2020). https://www.in.gov/gov/files/Executive%20Order%2020-13%20Medical%20Surge.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 15 Telemedicine guidance. State Medical Board of Ohio website. https://med.ohio.gov/Telemedicine-Guidance. Published 2020. Accessed September 13, 2021. 16 Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. COVID-19 guidance for OBOTs and other MAT programs utilizing buprenorphine. 2020. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/mentalhealth/documents/TDMHSAS_COVID19_Preparedness_OBOT.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 17 Pennsylvania Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs. Use of telehealth for outpatient drug and alcohol services funded by the Single County Authority. Information Bulletin. March 18, 2020. https://www.ddap.pa.gov/Documents/Information%20Bulletins/IB%2001-20.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 18 State of New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services. COVID-19 and opioid treatment program guidance. March 24, 2020. https://nj.gov/humanservices/library/slides/OTP%20Preparedness%20Guidelines%20March%2024%202020.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 19 Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC 13 (2016). https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/. Accessed October 4, 2021. 20 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016, Pub L No. 114-198, 130 Stat 695 (2016). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/524/actions. Accessed October 4, 2021. 21 Vestal C. Nurse licensing laws block treatment for opioid addiction. Stateline. April 21, 2017. http://pew.org/2ovzXRI. Accessed September 13, 2021.. 22 Practice guidelines for the administration of buprenorphine for treating opioid use disorder. Fed Regist. 2021;86(80): 22439-22440. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/04/28/2021-08961/practice-guidelines-for-the-administration-of-buprenorphine-for-treating-opioid-use-disorder. Accessed October 4, 2021. 23 FAQs on new HHS guidelines. American Society of Addiction Medicine website. https://www.asam.org/education/live-online-cme/waiver-qualifying-training/faqs-on-new-hhs-guidelines-(4-27-21). Published April 27, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2021. 24 New HHS practice guidelines. CA Bridge website. https://cabridge.org/general/new-hhs-practice-guidelines/. Published May 3, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2021. 25 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin Opioid Treatment Program Patient Reference Handbook. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Health Services; 2016. https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/publications/p2/p23048.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 26 Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. Controlled Substance Guidelines for Missouri Practitioners. St. Louis: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services; 2019. https://health.mo.gov/safety/bndd/doc/practitionersguidelines.doc. Accessed October 4, 2021. 27 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Opioid treatment program (OTP) guidance. March 19, 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/otp-guidance-20200316.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 28 Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. COVID-19 and opioid treatment programs. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/sample-otp-covid-19-faqs.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 29 Health department rolls out methadone delivery program for New Yorkers impacted by COVID-19. NYC Health website. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/about/press/pr2020/methadone-delivery-program.page. Published May 19, 2020. Accessed September 13, 2021. 30 State of New Hampshire Office of the Govenor. Exec. Order No. 2020-20 (2020). New Hampshire Emergency Rule 3-20-20. https://www.governor.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt336/files/documents/2020-20.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 31 Nevada State Board of Pharmacy. Guidance on the authority of a pharmacist to issue emergency refills in response to COVID-19. May 5, 2020. https://bop.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/bopnvgov/content/Resources/ALL/8.17%20Guidance%20On%20the%20Authority%20of%20a%20Pharmacist%20to%20Issue%20Emergency%20Refills%20in%20Response%20to%20COVID-19.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 32 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Federal Guidelines for Opioid Treatment Programs. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2015. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/Federal-Guidelines-for-Opioid-Treatment-Programs/PEP15-FEDGUIDEOTP. Accessed September 13, 2021. 33 Additional Service Requirements for Opioid Maintenance, 105 Mass. Reg. 164.304 (2016). https://casetext.com/regulation/code-of-massachusetts-regulations/department-105-cmr-department-of-public-health/title-105-cmr-164000-licensure-of-substance-abuse-treatment-programs/part-two-levels-of-care/section-164304-additional-service-requirements-for-opioid-maintenance. Accessed September 13, 2021. 34 Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Behavioral Health Services, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention. Licensure Standards for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Treatment Programs. Little Rock: Arkansas Department of Human Services; 2011. https://www.sos.arkansas.gov/uploads/rulesRegs/Arkansas%20Register/2011/Jan11Reg/016.23.10-003.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 35 Washington State Health Care Authority. COVID-19 and prescribers of buprenorphine containing products in office based opioid treatment settings: frequently asked questions. https://www.hca.wa.gov/assets/billers-and-providers/office-based-opioid-treatment-covid-19-faq.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 36 Office based opioid treatment (OBOT). The Indian Health Service (IHS) website. https://www.ihs.gov/opioids/recovery/obot/. Accessed September 13, 2021. 37 Crotty K, Freedman KI, Kampman KM. Executive summary of the Focused Update of the ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. J Addict Med. 2020;14(2):99-112. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000635. 38 Outpatient Treatment Programs, Rule 501-21 Utah Admin Code (2019). https://casetext.com/regulation/utah-administrative-code/human-services/title-r501-administration-administrative-services-licensing/rule-r501-21-outpatient-treatment-programs. Accessed October 4, 2021. 39 Counseling Services, 440 Ind Admin Code 10-4-6 (2016). https://casetext.com/regulation/indiana-administrative-code/title-440-division-of-mental-health-and-addiction/article-10-minimum-standards-for-the-provision-of-services-by-opioid-treatment-facilities-and-programs/rule-440-iac-10-4-specific-approval-of-opioid-treatment-programs/section-440-iac-10-4-6-counseling-services. Accessed October 4, 2021. 40 Counseling Sessions, 12 VAC 35-105-970 (2011). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/admincode/title12/agency35/chapter105/section970/#. Accessed October 4, 2021. 41 California Health and Human Services Agency, Department of Health Care Services. DHCS COVID-19 frequently asked questions: narcotic treatment programs (NTPs). March 13, 2020. https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/home/showdocument?id=41862. Accessed October 4, 2021. 42 State of West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Bureau for Medical Services. Memorandum: medication assisted treatment services counseling/therapy requirements. May 20, 2020. https://dhhr.wv.gov/bms/Documents/MAT%20Therapy%20Suspension%20MAY2020%20Update.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 43 Orgera K, Tolbert J. The Opioid Epidemic and Medicaid’s Role in Facilitating Access to Treatment. San Francisco, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019. https://files.kff.org/attachment/Issue-Brief-The-Opioid-Epidemic-and-Medicaids-Role-in-Facilitating-Access-to-Treatment. Accessed October 4, 2021. 44 Substance Use–Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) for Patients and Communities Act, HR 6, 115th Cong. (2018). https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr6/BILLS-115hr6enr.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 45 Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC). Report to Congress: Utilization Management of Medication-Assisted Treatment in Medicaid. Washington, DC: MACPAC; 2019. https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Report-to-Congress-Utilization-Management-of-Medication-Assisted-Treatment-in-Medicaid.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 46 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Medicaid Coverage of Medication-Assisted Treatment for Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders and of Medication for the Reversal of Opioid Overdose. HHS Publication No. SMA-18-5093. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2018. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/medicaidfinancingmatreport_0.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 47 Gifford K, Ellis E, Lashbrook A, et al. A View From the States: Key Medicaid Policy Changes: Results From a 50-State Medicaid Budget Survey for State Fiscal Years 2019 and 2020. San Francisco, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019. https://www.kff.org/report-section/a-view-from-the-states-key-medicaid-policy-changes-benefits-and-cost-sharing/. Accessed September 13, 2021. 48 Andrews CM, Grogan CM, Abraham A, Westlake M, Harris S. Gaps in coverage for opioid use disorder treatment in Medicaid managed care. Presented at: Michael M. Davis Lecture, University of Chicago, Center for Health Administration Studies; October 13, 2020; Chicago, IL. 49 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. COVID-19 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for State Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Agencies. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2021. https://www.medicaid.gov/state-resource-center/downloads/covid-19-faqs.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 50 CareSource. COVID-19 Prior Authorization Guidance. May 21, 2020. https://www.caresource.com/documents/oh-med-p-135550-covid-19-prior-authorization-guidance-network-notification-update/. Accessed October 4, 2021. 51 Augenstein J, Marks J, Peng A, Andrade M. Executive summary: tracking telehealth changes state-by-state in response to COVID-19. Manatt website. https://manatt.com/insights/newsletters/covid-19-update/executive-summary-tracking-telehealth-changes-stat. Published August 23, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2021. 52 Session Law 2020-82. SB 361. 2019 Session (N.C. 2019). https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2019/Bills/Senate/PDF/S361v8.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2021. 53 Priest KC. The COVID-19 pandemic: practice and policy considerations for patients with opioid use disorder. Health Affairs Blog. April 3, 2020. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200331.557887/full/. Accessed September 13, 2021. 54 Connolly B, McBournie A, Doyle S. More flexible methadone access should continue post-pandemic. Pew. April 22, 2021. https://pew.org/3emKNp0. Accessed September 13, 2021. 55 Knopf A. Extended methadone take-homes during COVID: nothing but success. Addiction Treatment Forum website. https://atforum.com/2020/07/extended-methadone-take-homes-during-covid-nothing-but-success/. Published July 8, 2020. Accessed September 13, 2021.
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
An endowed operating foundation that engages in nonpartisan analysis, collaboration, and communication, with an emphasis on state health policy.