The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, healthy aging, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 24, 2021
Sustainable Health Care Costs Peterson-Milbank Program for Sustainable Health Care Costs
Jennifer Sayles, MD, MPH
Jan 10, 2023
Oct 31, 2022
Back to Publications
States with health care cost growth targets (or benchmarks) need to perform two types of analyses on data collected from payers and providers to identify factors driving health care spending levels and health care spending growth:
These two types of cost analyses are complementary: the regularly released reports draw attention to health care spending patterns that warrant further investigation via in-depth reports. The end goal is to use both types of analyses to identify and implement strategies to mitigate cost growth. Because the analyses are intended to inform and result in actions to address cost growth, we refer to the overarching strategy as a “data use strategy.”
A primary application of the data use strategy analyses is to inform each state about the specific factors contributing to health care cost growth in their state. The analyses could be of additional value if states with cost growth targets conduct them in the same way to facilitate valid comparisons across states. However, any differences in methods and data sources would need to be considered before these comparisons could be made.
This brief initially focuses on the design of the first category of analysis, which serves as a starting point for understanding health care spending patterns and trends. We present an analytic framework for these analyses, as well as a series of 11 recommended standard reports that apply the key framework dimensions. We also provide examples of more advanced analyses that we call “Phase 2,” which states may develop once they have mastered the standard reports. Stakeholder engagement and involvement of multiple state agencies in the design of the reports can help ensure that the analyses will be put to productive use.
Read the report
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
An endowed operating foundation that engages in nonpartisan analysis, collaboration, and communication, with an emphasis on state health policy.