The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Supporting networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
Advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources provide relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Upcoming and past Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 1998 (Volume 76)
Quarterly Article
Paul W. Newacheck
Neal Halfon
Claire D. Brindis
Dana C. Hughes
Sep 14, 2026
Sep 9, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Publicly funded categorical programs for children often differ in eligibility rules, allowable services, and criteria for provider participation, making it necessary for families to navigate through several programs to piece together care for their children. Recognizing these problems, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation launched a national demonstration project in 1991 with the goal of decategorizing children’s health services in nine communities. It was hoped that by releasing funds from categorical restrictions on their use, scarce public resources could be directed where they might have the greatest impact. However, the demonstration sites confronted a number of challenges in designing and implementing decategorization strategies: an absence of existing models and effective technical assistance; political hurdles in gaining cooperation from the multiple local agencies engaged in service provision; and difficulties in carrying out major programmatic changes when the health care system itself was rapidly being transformed. The proposition that decategorization holds promise as a tool for improving access to health care deserves further investigation.
Author(s): Paul W. Newacheck; Neal Halfon; Claire D. Brindis; Dana C. Hughes
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 76, Issue 2 (pages 157–173) DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00085 Published in 1998