The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest posts from our staff and guest authors.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
July 2, 2026
Fact Sheet
Hayley Piazza
Publication
Jun 30, 2026
Jun 26, 2026
Jun 23, 2026
Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration projects, commonly referred to as waivers, are widely used by states to test innovative approaches to improving population health through Medicaid programs. Waiver projects must be authorized by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), who determines whether the project promotes the objectives of the Medicaid program and meets federal “budget neutrality” requirements. In a Milbank Quarterly Perspective from the 2026 special issue, Disease Burden, Mortality, and Life Expectancy in the United States: What Can State Policymakers Do to Meet the Challenges?, Leighton Ku of George Washington University’s Milken Institute School of Public Health proposes including Medicare savings in the budget neutrality limits, which currently require that federal Medicaid expenditures alone do not exceed what the federal government would have spent if the project was not adopted.
Section 1115 waivers provide states with flexibility to implement policies such as expanded eligibility, modified enrollment procedures, and expanded coverage for services that address health-related social needs, including mental health care, nutrition, and housing supports. According to Ku, modest improvements in Medicaid introduced through waivers could potentially yield substantial savings not only to Medicare but to overall federal medical care expenditures. But there is currently no incentive for state Medicaid programs to propose or implement projects that lower overall medical costs, including Medicare.
Ku’s four reasons for including Medicare expenditures in the calculation of federal budget neutrality include:
Extending Medicaid Section 1115 budget neutrality policies to include Medicare expenditure savings could create incentives to develop novel Medicaid policies that improve the health of Medicare beneficiaries and lower Medicare expenditures, such as investments in Medicaid long-term care or diabetes prevention policies.
Example: The Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) offers sessions to prevent the onset of diabetes for Medicare beneficiaries who are prediabetic, obese, or have not been diagnosed with diabetes. Given that diabetes risks often occur before the age of 65 and Medicare eligibility, a large group of Medicaid beneficiaries could be eligible for DPP, which can delay the onset of Type 2 diabetes and reduce overall health care costs.
Ku points out that this policy change will require modification of the limitations imposed by Section 71118 of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which codified stricter federal budget neutrality requirements for Section 1115 demonstrations beginning in 2027.
“Fundamentally, permitting budget neutrality of Section 1115 projects to also include Medicare expenditures supports common sense and holistic budgeting, as well as improved strategies to improve health across the life span,” he writes.
Back to Publications