The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
February 27, 2024
Policy Report
Yalda Jabbarpour
Anuradha Jetty
Hoon Byun
Anam Siddiqi
Stephen Petterson
Jeongyoung Park
Publication
Sep 21, 2026
Jul 23, 2026
Jul 15, 2026
Technology has the potential to expand primary care access and strengthen primary care delivery. Patient portals can allow for asynchronous care, and the electronic health record (EHR) can make population health management more accessible for primary care clinicians. Telehealth can expand access to populations who have limited transportation, time off from work, or child care. Furthermore, EHR interoperability can improve care coordination across clinical settings and partnerships with public health and community-based organizations to foster comprehensive, whole-person care. Yet, if not designed, implemented, or supported adequately — and if the entire team is not involved in managing it — technology can worsen administrative burden for primary care clinicians, further fragmenting care and burning out an already overburdened workforce. In fact, recent data from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) show that 16% of family physicians report spending four or more hours per day outside of patient care on EHRs.74
If not designed, implemented, or supported adequately – and if the entire team is not involved in managing it – technology can worsen administrative burden for primary care clinicians, further fragmenting care and burning out an already overburdened workforce.
Poor “usability” may account for some of the time spent. In 2022 over 40% of family physicians gave a poor or fair rating to the “ease of finding relevant information” in their EHR (Figure 10). And half of those surveyed gave those same low scores when rating the usefulness of alerts from their EHR (Figure 10). Not surprisingly, one-quarter of family physicians were dissatisfied with their EHR (Figure 11). Although HIT has the potential to improve access for patients, these data suggest that HIT is currently a contributor to the access problem.
Data Source: American Board of Family Medicine recertification exam, 2022Notes: A total of 2,117 respondents completed the EHR usability questions.74
Data Source: American Board of Family Medicine recertification exam, 2022Notes: A total of 4,261 respondents completed the EHR satisfaction questions.74
This data could help explain why patients report access to primary clinicians is diminishing; increased workload requirements are reducing the size of patient panels that clinical teams are able to effectively manage.
Back to Publications