The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
October 28, 2022
Feb 12, 2024
Oct 30, 2023
Aug 15, 2023
Back to Articles and Updates
Last June, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) requested input from the public — including providers, payers, purchasers, advocates, researchers, and others — about the federal government’s role in strengthening primary health care. The input may also inform the HHS Initiative to Strengthen Primary Health Care’s two-to-three-year plan that will outline HHS agency and office actions to improve primary care and ways to establish a primary health care infrastructure in HHS. In its request for information, OASH asked respondents for “information about innovations, models, solutions to barriers, and possible HHS actions that may strengthen primary health care to promote health equity, reduce health disparities, improve health care access, and improve health outcomes.”
OASH received several hundred responses to their request for information. The Milbank Memorial Fund was able to collect 40 of these to identify and analyze any emerging trends. These responses came from a diverse range of advocacy groups, professional societies, philanthropic foundations, and non-profit organizations. Below, some of the proposed recommendations for HHS are categorized by the objectives mentioned in the 2021 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) report on Strengthening Primary Health Care (Payment, Access, Workforce, Health Information Technology, and Measurement/Accountability) and federal HHS authority (Medicare, Medicaid, and other).
The most frequently proposed recommendation, with 34 mentions, was that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) increase its investment in primary care or establish a primary care spend target. In the US, primary care receives 5% to 7% of total health care spending, with an even lower percentage spent in Medicare, despite primary care accounting for approximately 35% of all health care visits each year. According to the responses, this lack of funding is potentially linked to inadequate access, low-quality care, and worse patient outcomes, particularly for underserved populations.
Other popular recommendations included “collaborating with state efforts” and new Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation payment models that align with the NASEM report’s recommendation of shifting payers from a fee-for-service (FFS) model to hybrid models that provide primary care providers with additional flexibility and financial stability.
A number of respondents called for the adoption of a federal definition of primary care and creation of a standard for researching, measuring, and reporting primary care spending, ideally through a central federal office or agency. Such standardization would facilitate the dissemination of information between states and the federal government about new payment models, successful approaches, and progress. Relatedly, multiple groups expressed a desire for a technical assistance program or support for electronic health record (EHR) system implementation to ease information sharing between health care professionals, state health agencies, and federal agencies.
Several advocacy groups and professional organizations supported the integration of primary care with behavioral health, social services, and public health to promote whole-person care and health equity. These groups reported that although primary care providers encounter patients with behavioral health needs, they are often ill-equipped to treat them because of a lack of resources and staff. The respondents called for support for interprofessional primary care teams that may include registered nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, community health workers, and mental health workers, among others. These workers would add capacity to primary care practices while reducing personnel burnout.
Some respondents also expressed support for telehealth or virtual care to provide more equitable access to primary care, especially for those in rural areas. Furthermore, there was significant interest in creating incentives for careers in primary care and reforming graduate medical education financing to allow for more primary care training opportunities in community-based practice environments.
Overall, based on the responses reviewed, there appears to be significant interest in the HHS Initiative to Strengthen Primary Health Care. This feedback should inform HHS policies and actions that will move the US health system toward strengthening its high-quality primary care foundation.
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
An endowed operating foundation that engages in nonpartisan analysis, collaboration, and communication, with an emphasis on state health policy.