Evidence to Support State Policies Regulating Teen Use of Social Media Is Limited, Study Finds

A new Milbank Quarterly study published today, June 4, 2025, finds that the evidence base supporting policies that restrict social media use like school cell phone bans and anti-cyberbullying laws has significant limitations.

More than 50 bills related to adolescent social media regulation have been adopted or enacted in more than half of all U.S. states, with legislators often citing concerns about mental health, harmful content, and developmental impacts. According to the article, most of the legislation uses one of two strategies to reduce adolescents’ social media use or shape their experiences: 1) imposing restrictions or mandates on social media platforms such as required privacy protection or bans on targeted advertising, or 2) imposing restrictions or mandates on adolescent users, parents, and school administrators, such as bans on cell phones or social media on school-owned devices.

After analyzing the policies, authors Marco Thimm-Kaiser and Katherine M. Keyes of Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health evaluated media content that included elected government officials’ statements in support of 69 state social media legislative initiatives adopted or enacted prior to September 2024. They then looked at the strength of the research on social media’s effects, and the impact of interventions, on mental health and development. The authors identified some evidence to support associations between social media use and adverse adolescent outcomes, particularly for vulnerable youth, but concluded that the research cannot definitively establish the “causal effects” of harm or the benefits of the policies.

“We’re seeing policymakers move with increasing urgency to protect youth from the possible negative impacts of social media and digital technologies,” said Marco Thimm-Kaiser, a doctoral student in Epidemiology at Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health and lead author of the study. “At the same time, the precise role of social media in contributing to adverse outcomes for young people, as well as the effectiveness of policies aimed at restricting youth social media use, remain far from fully understood. As the evidence continues to evolve, it will be vital for policymakers to remain open to reevaluating and refining the emerging policy interventions to ensure we are getting the response right.”

Authors Thimm-Kaiser and Keyes offer several priorities for researchers that will help inform policy, including differentiating among types of social media experiences; focusing on children and adolescents with psychiatric symptoms, who are more likely to report harm from social media, such as addiction-like symptoms; and rigorously evaluating existing state policies. They also call for state policymakers to balance action with evidence as they introduce social media interventions for adolescents.

“As technology continues to evolve rapidly, it is critical that policies intended to protect young people are based on rigorous science, while also striking a careful balance between thorough evaluation and timely policy implementation” noted Katherine Keyes, PhD, professor of Epidemiology, and senior author. “Our research shows that the evidence base underlying social media policies continues to have serious gaps that need to be filled so that we can inform the most effective policies.”

For more information, contact:
Christine Haran
Communications Director
Milbank Memorial Fund
917-216-5359
charan@milbank.org