The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
May 11, 2022
Blog Post
Rachel Block
Oct 2, 2024
Sep 17, 2024
Sep 11, 2024
Back to The Milbank Blog
Evidence suggests strong primary care is foundational to health system transformation. It can help people lead long, healthy lives and improve health equity. Yet, primary care spending in the United States is a very small component of total health care costs, and absent direct policy interventions, this spending is not likely to increase.
One approach to better supporting primary care that has gained traction is the implementation of advanced primary care models, which offer team-based, holistic care. These models are supported by various types of alternatives to fee-for-service (FFS) payments, which aim to constrain total costs of care while improving patients’ outcomes and experience. Yet, relatively little attention has been given to setting standards for the data collection and analysis needed to track whether and how these payment models actually support primary care.
The 2021 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report on Implementing High-Quality Primary Care calls for spreading the use of payment models that support high-quality primary care by paying for enhanced primary care functions. The Milbank Memorial Fund has also supported research on and implementation of new primary care payment models, as well as state primary care spending targets, as ways to increase investment in primary care. In their 2022 legislative sessions, four states have adopted policies to measure, publicly report, and increase primary care spending, and more states are poised to adopt similar programs.
But the success of these initiatives is hindered by our lack of insight into current spending on primary care. We have limited data available to monitor how much health plans spend on primary care in total, even less information on their non-claims (or non-FFS) payments for primary care, and essentially no information about how dollars flow through these new payment models or through larger health systems. As a result, we cannot keep track of dollars spent on specific primary care transformation activities, or even how much in total is allocated to the non-claims or non-FFS component. States with all payer claims databases (APCDs) generally do not collect this information, and when they do, it is not collected in a way that is standardized across states.
A recent survey accounting for almost three-quarters of the national health care market found that 60% of payments are now being made through enhanced FFS or alternate payment models. It is increasingly important that we implement consistent data collection and reporting for these payments. There are important ways that states can use non-claims payment data with or without a primary care spending target:
We have some models for non-claims payment data collection and reporting that can be adopted or adapted on a more widespread basis.
Slow but certain progress can be achieved as more states adopt primary care investment targets and reporting requirements, and then converge by developing standard methods for data reporting. But the movement toward accountable alternative payment models for primary care can be further accelerated if national and federal efforts are aligned around common goals, terms, and methods. The National Association of Health Data Organizations has been working on standards for non-claims data submission to state APCDs. But given the crucial nexus between data needs and new primary care payment models, the faster pathway for consistent adoption would be national data standards and reporting requirements established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The United States needs to measure primary care spending with a common yard stick to improve how we invest in primary care. It is time to establish specific national standards for non-claims payment data collection and reporting for alternative payment models used by health plans and systems.