The Fund supports several networks of state health policymakers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis on topics important to state health policymakers, particularly on issues related to state leadership, primary care, aging, and total costs of care.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is an endowed operating foundation that publishes The Milbank Quarterly, commissions projects, and convenes state health policy decision makers on issues they identify as important to population health.
June 16, 2015
Christopher F. Koller, President
Back to President’s Blog: The View from Here
Randy Newman had it right 28 years ago and today—judging from recent events in Baltimore. Riots tore apart the city at the end of April in the wake of Freddie Gray’s death in police custody, and the after-effects continue to ripple. Homicides in May of this year were 50% higher than May of last year driven, some say, by the large amounts of drugs in circulation looted from 27 pharmacies and two methadone clinics during the riots.
In the weeks after the riots, commentators pointed to the many health disparities in the West Baltimore neighborhood compared to other Baltimore neighborhoods, let alone wealthier suburban neighbors. In a May 2015 JAMA Viewpoint, Wen and Sharfstein noted that Baltimore’s poorer neighborhoods had life expectancies that were six years shorter than those of other neighborhoods—and saw poor performance on other social determinants of health as well:
The news that socio-economic and geographic disparities in health exist is hardly new, but gained trenchancy in the wake of the unrest. The interactions between the various factors and the outcomes may be difficult to untangle, but the inequities cited here breed the social unrest the city witnessed.
The renewed attention on health disparities and their connection to social unrest creates an opportunity for people who work in health care and population health to call to mind a few important lessons.
The Goal: Long Life Span
Source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
First, public health has it right. If we value long life spans for ourselves and our neighbors, we cannot lose sight of the factors that make those long life spans possible. McGinnis and his colleagues put the contributing factors to premature death as follows:
Notice the small size of the health care slice of the pie. Keep that in mind as Congressional members rush to hop on the “21st Century Cures” legislation bandwagon and dole out protections for one set of innovators—the pharmaceutical industry. Similarly, dollars spent developing and promoting a hospital’s cutting-edge surgical capacity are dollars not available for preventing and treating the chronic conditions that disproportionately affect poor neighborhoods. Indeed, lead poisoning’s effect on brain development was in part what sentenced Freddie Gray to a short and unfulfilled life. If we are committed to long life spans for all, no new drug or surgery can do the work of a safe environment, a stable childhood, and a good education.
Inching Toward Progress—In Baltimore
Sometimes lost in the discussion, however, is that progress is being made. From the University of Wisconsin’s County Health Rankings comes analysis that Baltimore’s health status is slowly approaching that of the entire state:
This is good news and not the result of chance or a rising economic tide. Rather, committed, persistent public health leadership and investments in epidemiology and interventions that focus on prevention are paying off. There will be fewer Freddie Grays in Baltimore’s future because of lead poisoning prevention efforts. The city and its inhabitants will continue to reap the rewards of successful efforts to lower smoking rates. In the future, statewide efforts to promote payment reform and make providers accountable for the health of populations will create greater opportunities for investment in and integration with these public health efforts.
“Hard Just to Live”
These improvements do not, however, take away from the fact that disparities in health status remain—and that for too many in Baltimore it remains “hard just to live.” Equal access to decent housing, a good education, employment opportunity, and criminal justice will continue to be critical issues in Baltimore and many other places in the US. Money spent on health care is money not available for child care, schools, and community centers. We ignore these facts and misplaced priorities at our own peril and that of our communities.
Last summer, the news was full of stories of kids sitting in juvenile detention camps in Texas after walking alone from El Salvador and Guatemala to escape violence. Some of those kids are now in Baltimore—and have worked hard enough to be finishing eighth grade and graduating from places like Armisted Gardens School in East Baltimore. They have come so far in only a year. But what future—what hope of a long and fulfilling life—are we giving them, and others, who live in Baltimore and other low-income communities across the country?
Just as helping people achieve long life spans requires looking beyond the allure of individual patient care to the lessons of public health, the health of communities and societies requires attention to fair and just economic, political, and legal processes.
Jan 24, 2020
Jan 21, 2020
Jan 13, 2020
Get the Latest from the Milbank Memorial Fund
An endowed operating foundation that engages in nonpartisan analysis, collaboration, and communication, with an emphasis on state health policy.