The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 19, 2024
News Article
Mary Louise Gilburg
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 14, 2026
Back to News Articles
This year, our five most-read publications (not including Milbank Quarterly articles) included the Primary Care Scorecard; a brief with recommendations for improving health care market oversight at the state level; a blog on the impact of a Supreme Court decision that opened the door to more legal challenges to federal regulations; and more. We hope you’ll check out or revisit these pieces.
The second national Primary Care Scorecard revealed an intensifying primary care crisis and identified five reasons why access to affordable, quality primary care services is expected to get worse. Developed by Yalda Jabbarpour and colleagues at the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Robert Graham Center and co-funded by the Milbank Memorial Fund and The Physicians Foundation, the report and data dashboard examine critical measures of primary care performance nationally and across states.
To address consolidation of health systems and physician practices, the entry of private equity, and other market changes, some states have strengthened and expanded the authority of their attorneys general, along with their health departments or independent state entities, to review and approve or reject proposed mergers. This report from Erin C. Fuse Brown of Georgia State University and Katherine L. Gudiksen of the Source on Healthcare Price and Competition offered recommendations and policy considerations for state policymakers to strengthen oversight authority of health care transactions.
In June, the Supreme Court overturned longstanding precedent by striking down the “Chevron doctrine,” a 40-year-old standard that required courts to defer to federal regulatory agencies to interpret ambiguous laws. This blog from Marci Nielsen explained how it will change the way key health agencies do business — and its impact on state health policy.
Given the rise in the rates of behavioral health conditions, many state officials are looking for ways to track spending on behavioral health treatment in order to measure workforce needs, improve care, set investment targets, and more. In this report, authors from Freedman HealthCare offered recommendations for a standardized state methodology to measure how much payers spend on behavioral health clinical services in a way that allows for comparability across states.
This series of Peterson-Milbank analytics support resources offered insight into how to use publicly available data sources to examine the financial condition of hospitals, as well as identify opportunities to reduce health care spending growth.